arrow left
arrow right
  • Jackson -v- University Enterprises Corp At CSUSB et al Print Wrongful Termination Unlimited  document preview
  • Jackson -v- University Enterprises Corp At CSUSB et al Print Wrongful Termination Unlimited  document preview
  • Jackson -v- University Enterprises Corp At CSUSB et al Print Wrongful Termination Unlimited  document preview
  • Jackson -v- University Enterprises Corp At CSUSB et al Print Wrongful Termination Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

V , ’EfiJ r, F, \a 0_ NI \~ A M a5. "i“‘i'v F LED l ' _ SUPERIOR COURT OF CALiFORNIA M1chael G. Martm, State Bar Number 164867 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Szu-Pei Lu, State Bar Number: 231397 Cynthia Herrera, State Bar Number: 165095 GRAVES & KING, LLP MAY 2 6 2023 Attorneys at Law f r 500 North Brand Blvd. Suite 1850 ,1 3 ‘ Glendale, California 91203 RT. JO dyn Drake Deputy Telephone: (8 1 8) 55 1 -1 1 12 Facsimile: (8 1 8) 55 1-0425 Attorneys for Defendant, UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES CORP AT CSUSB, a California corporation SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 0%)??5 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 10 JOANNA LYNN JACKSON, an individual, case N0, CIVSB2301219 11 12 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES CORP AT CSUSB’S 13 v. ANSWER To COMPLAINT 14 Hon- Jeffrey R- EriCkson UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES CORP AT DOES Dept: $14 15 CSUSB, a California corporation; and 1 _ through 10, Complamt Flled: March 16, 2023 WW 16 17 Defendants. 18 I 19 COMES Now the Defendant, 20 (hereafter referred to as “Defendant” or “UNIVERSITY”), for itself alone and for no other, answers 21 the Complaint ofplaintiff, JOANNA LYNN JACKSON, as follows: 22 GENERAL DENIAL 23 Under and by Virtue of the provisions of Section 431.30(d) of the Code 0f Civil Procedure, 24 Defendant denies generally and specifically each and every allegation contained in the unverified 25 Complaint, and the whole thereof, and each and every alleged cause of action thereof, and denies 26 that the Plaintiff herein was damaged or will be damaged in the sum therein alleged, 0r in any sum 27 or sums whatsoever, 0r at all by reason 0f any act, breach 0r omission on the part of this answering 28 Defendant. 1 DEFENDANT UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES CORP AT CSUSB’S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT oaéy laleoelir £57? Wvé-ow 984W ON'OHbfAta‘Jfirvg-sfi ‘23:; (1;? zyxou ~ I ' u; LCM ajéxgggfis ' ‘ H V