On September 20, 2017 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Barghi Kasra,
Barghi Mansour-Hossein,
Barghi Real Estate Investments Llc,
Dimlux Llc,
Un Jane I.,
and
Barghi Kasra,
Barghi Real Estate Investments Llc,
Dimlux Llc,
Fidelity National Title Company A California Corporation,
M & A Equities Llc A California Limited Liability Company,
Un Jane I.,
for Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/26/2019 05:36 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Inloes,Deputy Clerk
1 CRAFTS LAW FIRM
Angelo A DuPlantier, State Bar No. 162992
2 Warren S. Fujimoto, State Bar No. 192343
333 S. Anita Drive, Suite 730
3 Orange, CA 92868
Telephone: (949) 484-7400
4 Facsimile: (949) 486-0171
5 Attorneys for Cross-Defendant
M & A EQUITIES, INC.
6
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CAt.JFORNIA
9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, VAN NUYS COURHOUSE EAST
10
11 MANSOUR-HOSSEIN BARGHI, Case No. LC106244
� Plaintiff, OBJECTION TC� EVIDENCED OFFERED
12
vs. BY PLAINTIFF !IN
SUPPORT FOR HIS
� � ,.,
� � Cl)
13 MOTION FOR Ji'RELIMINARY
....
la;,
(/) Cl)
KASRA BARGHI, BARGHI REAL ESTATE INJUNCTION
::: i
�N 14 INVESTMENTS, LLC; ADVANTAGE JANE
< >
,.J -: u
C(
I . UN, DIMLUX, LLC and DOES 1-10. Date: October 3 2019
r,i O oi 15 Time: 8:30 a.m.
la;, =
E,-< G Cl
< = C:
C:
--------------------; Dept: W
� cc �
u (/),o 16
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS. Trial Date: Sept�mber 23, 2019
�"' 17
18
TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR COU�SEL OF RECORD:
19
Cross-Defendant M & A EQUITIES, INC. (hereinafter "M �" A") hereby objects to the
20
following evidence offered by PlaintiffMANSOUR-HOSSEIN BAltGHI in support of his Motion
21
for Preliminary Injunction on each and all of the following grounds:
22
23
Evidence Objection(s) Ruling
24
1. Declaration of F. Bari Nejadroup, 'J 4: "There is Inadmissible opinions,
25 no prejudice to the lender, M&A EQUITIES for having argum« nt and legal
to wait for resolution of Plaintiffs Quiet Title lawsuit to conclu: ions. Hayman v.
26 determine the respective rights of the parties and the Block I 1986) 176
27 lender." Cal.Apb.3d 629, 639; Evid.
Code€ 6 801, 802.
28
OBJECTION TO EVIDENCED OFFERED BY PLAINTIFF IN SUPPO T FOR HIS MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION I
2823674.1 28154-00367
Document Filed Date
September 26, 2019
Case Filing Date
September 20, 2017
Category
Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Court Finding - After Court Trial 01/27/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.