arrow left
arrow right
  • SAUL LOPEZ ET AL VS SHANT ARIS NAZARYAN ET AL Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • SAUL LOPEZ ET AL VS SHANT ARIS NAZARYAN ET AL Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILEQ by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/19/2019 10:26 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by L. Coreas,Deputy Clerk SIAMAK VAZIRI, ESQ. [SBN 242447] MATTHEW M. TAYLOR, ESQ. [SBN 252556] AARON G. MILLER, ESQ. [SBN 279126] VAZIRI LAW GROUP, APC 5757 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 670 Los Angeles, CA 90036 Telephone: (310) 777-7540 Facsimile: (310) 777-0373 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, SAUL LOPEZ and ADELA LOPEZ SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ce 12 SAUL LOPEZ and ADELA LOPEZ, Case No.: BC678211 13 14 Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND AMENDED MOTION IN LIMINE #6 TO aa vs. EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OR TESTIMONY REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MEDICAL 16 SHANT ARIS NAZARYAN; RAZMIK ) PROVIDERS’ TOTAL INCOME OR 17 NAZARYAN. and DOES 1 to 25 Inclusive, ) EARNINGS 18 Defendants. Filed: October 2, 2017 Trial: October 8, 2019 19 20 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 22 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, prior to the commencement of trial and the selection of 23 jury, Plaintiffs Saul Lopez and Adela Lopez will seek an order will seek an order precluding 24 Defendants Shant Aris Nazaryan, Razmik Nazaryan, and Marine Nazaryan, and their attorneys 25 from referencing in any way the total income earned by the medical providers who treated Plaintiff 26 for her injuries arising from the subject incident. This motion is made on the grounds that such 27 evidence, testimony, or reference violates the providers’ right to privacy as articulated in Stony 28 Brook I Homeowners Ass’n v. Superior Court (Diehl) (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 692. PLAINTIFFS” ee MOTION IN LIMINE #6