arrow left
arrow right
  • SAUL LOPEZ ET AL VS SHANT ARIS NAZARYAN ET AL Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • SAUL LOPEZ ET AL VS SHANT ARIS NAZARYAN ET AL Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by uperior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/02/2019 10:17 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Lopez, Deputy Clerk SIAMAK VAZIRI, ESQ. [SBN 242447] MATTHEW M. TAYLOR, ESQ. [SBN 252556] AARON G. MILLER, ESQ. [SBN 279126] VAZIRI LAW GROUP, APC 5757 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 670 Los Angeles, CA 90036 Telephone: (310) 777-7540 Facsimile: (310) 777-0373 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, SAUL LOPEZ and ADELA LOPEZ SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 1 SAUL LOPEZ and ADELA LOPEZ, Case No.: BC678211 12 Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND 13 MOTION IN LIMINE #9 TO EXCLUDE Vv. MENTION OF PLAINTIFFS’ COUNSEL’S 14 FIRM NAME OR ITS INDIVIDUAL 15 SHANT ARIS NAZARYAN; RAZMIK ) ATTORNEYS; MEMORANDUM OF NAZARYAN. and DOES | to 25 Inclusive, ) POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; 16 DECLARATION OF MATTHEW TAYLOR 17 Defendants. ) ) Filed: October 2, 2017 18 ) Trial: October 8, 2019 19 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 20 Plaintiffs, SAUL LOPEZ and ADELA LOPEZ (hereinafter collectively “PLAINTIFFS”) 21 hereby move this Court in imine for an order to preclude all parties, witnesses and counsel from 22 referring to, offering, or introducing into evidence the firm name, or its individual attorneys (other 23 than trial counsel), of PLAINTIFFS’ counsel, Vaziri Law Group, APC. PLAINTIFFS further 24 move the Court to instruct opposing parties and counsel and to require counsel to advise all 25 witnesses: 26 1 Not to attempt to convey to the jury, directly or indirectly, any of the facts 27 mentioned in this motion without first obtaining permission of the Court outside the presence and 28 hearing of the jury; PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE #9