arrow left
arrow right
  • SAUL LOPEZ ET AL VS SHANT ARIS NAZARYAN ET AL Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • SAUL LOPEZ ET AL VS SHANT ARIS NAZARYAN ET AL Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 11/22/2019 03:54 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by G. Perez-Moreno,Deputy Clerk SIAMAK VAZIRI, ESQ. [SBN 242447] MATTHEW M. TAYLOR, ESQ. [SBN 252556] AARON G. MILLER, ESQ. [SBN 279126] 3 VAZIRI LAW GROUP, APC 5757 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 670 Los Angeles, CA 90036 Telephone: (310) 777-7540 Facsimile: (310) 777-0373 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, SAUL LOPEZ and ADELA LOPEZ 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SAUL LOPEZ and ADELA LOPEZ, ) Case Nos BC678211 ) Plaintiffs, ) PLAINTIFFS'UPPLEMENTAL BRIEF 12 ) REGARDING DEFENDANTS'OTION IN vs. ) LIMINE NO. 5 RE 13 OF THE EVENT DATA DEFENDANTS'POLIATION ) SHANT ARIS NAZARYAN; RAZMIK ) RECORDER, AND NO. 7 RE SPEED; NAZARYAN. and DOES 1 to 25 Inclusive, ) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND 15 AUTHORITIES; DECLARATION OF ) 16 Defendants. ) MATTHEW TAYLOR ) ) Filed: October 2, 2017 ) Trial: November 21, 2019 18 ) ) ) 28 TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 21 At hearing on Motions in Limine on November 21, 2019, the Court requested further 22 briefing on the sole issue of spoliation in the context of an automobile collision. 23 I. DEFENDANTS'POLIATED THE CORVETTE AND ITS EDR 25 26 'ivil Code section 2330 holds, "An agent represents his principal for all purposes within the scope of his actual or ostensible authoritv, and all the rights and liabilities which would accrue to 27 the agent from transactions within such limit, if thev had been entered into on his own account. accrue to the principal.'* Pursuant to Civil Code 2332. "As against a principal, both principal and 28 spent are deemed to have notice of whatever either has notice of, and ought, in pood faith and the exercise of ordinary care and diligence, to communicate to the other." Thus, as a matter of law, PLAINTIFFS'UPPLEMENTAL BRIEF REGARDING DEFENDANTS'OTION IN LIMINE NO. 5 RE DEFENDANTS'POLIATION OF THE EVENT DATA RECORDER, AND NO. 7 RE SPEED I