arrow left
arrow right
  • CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON VS ALLSTATE INSURANCE Insurance Coverage (not complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON VS ALLSTATE INSURANCE Insurance Coverage (not complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

SO MICHAEL BARNES (Bar No. 121314) CYNTHIA LIU (Bar No. 263270) DENTONS US LLP One Market Plaza, Spear Tower, 24th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 FILED Superior Court of Telephone: (415) 267-4000 California AUR nl T ag Facsimile: (415) 267-4198 Anoeles Email: michael.barnes@dentons.com cynthia.liu@dentons.com JUL C4 201g Sherri. Car ce Attorneys for Defendant GTHeEFICIerK of Coury - By Xo. = ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY yLeputy Raul Sanchez SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 zS az NG 11 CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, Case No.: BC662525 Pury as LONDON, SUBSCRIBING TO no Bo 12 CERTIFICATE NUMBER SIPL24247; INDEX OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT nee oN OF ALLSTATE INSURANCE 258s Seay OSa Za Oe 13 Plaintiff, COMPANY’S OPPOSITION TO ga PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION FOR Agot 2s 14 vs. SUMMARY ADJUDICATION “3 5a 15 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY; Date: July 20, 2018 20 FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY; MID- Time 8:30 a.m. 16 CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY; Dept. 52 STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE Filed: May 24, 2017 17 COMPANY; and DOES 1 through 100, Trial: August 15, 2018 inclusive. 18 Defendants. 19 20 Defendant Allstate Insurance Company hereby submits the following evidence in support 21 of its Opposition To Plaintiff's Second Motion for Summary Adjudication Of Issues: 22 1 Complaint (without exhibits) (attached for the Court’s convenience) 23 2 August 23, 2017 Order (attached for the Court’s convenience) 24 3 Underwriters’ February 2018 motion for summary adjudication, without exhibits 25 (attached for the Court’s convenience) 26 Underwriters’ opposition to Allstate’s demurrer and motion to strike (attached for 27 the Court’s convenience) hn 28 INDEX OF EVIDENCE ISO ALLSTATE’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION FoR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION