arrow left
arrow right
  • ROSE CROCKETT VS THELMA FAYE MERRITT ET AL Quiet Title (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ROSE CROCKETT VS THELMA FAYE MERRITT ET AL Quiet Title (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

® @ ON i . ‘1 Christopher A. Fortunati Sy; ero Lt Law Offices of ‘ounty of Log of"California ROBERT M. BASKIN Angeles A Professional Corporation MAY 24 2017 1849 Knoll Drive Ventura, California 93003-7321 Sherri Carter, Ex, State Bar Number 191432 icer/Clerk By. Deputy WelNE ov (805) 658-1000 Attomeys for Plaintiff, ROSE CROCKETT SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNI A IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 1 ROSE CROCKETT, CASE NO. BC662684 12 - Plaintiff, 13 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES TO QUIET VS. TITLE, CANCELLATION OF 14 INSTRUMENTS FOR DECLARATORY THELMA FAYE MERRITT, SUSAN RELIEF, FRAUD AND DECEIT, FRAUD 15 WALKER and DOES 1 to 50, AND INDUCEMENT AND EQUITABLE 16 Defendants 1. Breach of Contract; 7 2. For Quiet Title; 3. Cancellation of Cloud on Title; 18 4. For Declaratory Relief. 19 COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, ROSE CROCKETT, (here inafter “Plaintiff” ) and allages as 20 follows: 21 t GENERAL ALLEGATIONS RUS J 5 23 morn bins ee = 1 Plaintiff, ROSE CROCKETT is an individual who, (hereinafter mete atall& es 24 eemaba fe i tz times alleged herein, is a resident of Los Angeles Pee Re m7 County, California “Ser: gee m« ted 25 a ga i 2, Plaintiff is informed and believes that Defe ndant, THELMA FAYE MERRIE, is 26 4h (hereinafter “Defendant Merritt’) at all times alleg BS i ed herein, is a resident of Kem County, 27 California 32 28 3 a 3. Plaintiff is informed and believes that Defendant, nh SUSAN;WALKER, = asses bo ty COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES Basa 15:19:29 2017-05-24 ts