arrow left
arrow right
  • KATHERINE TORRES VS MARIA DEL CARMENT ORDONEZ ET AL Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • KATHERINE TORRES VS MARIA DEL CARMENT ORDONEZ ET AL Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

© orig ROSNER, BARRY & BABBITT, LLP Hallen D. Rosner, SBN 109740 Jeffrey L. Le Pere, SBN 201787 10085 Carroll Canyon Road, Suite 100 doy ot So San Diego, California 92131 got wy ue M4 Telephone: (858) 348-1005 ® 3 \\s Facsimile: (858) 348-1150 one hal@rbblawgroup.com ae > jeff@rbblawgroup.com we ws Attomeys for Plaintiff Y FAX SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE 10 KATHERINE TORRES, an individual, CASE NO p06 6460 11 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT 12 V. 1 ACTION FOR RESCISSION BASED ON MISTAKE 13 MARIA DEL CARMEN ORDONEZ dba 2 VIOLATION OF THE CONSUMER DISCOUNT AND WHOLESALE AUTO, an LEGAL REMEDIES ACT; 14 individual; JB FINANCIAL, a business entity; 3 FRAUDULENT GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE MISREPRESENTATION: 15 COMPANY, a business entity; and DOES 1 NEGLIGENT through 10, inclusive, MISREPRESENTATION 16 VIOLATION OF SONG - BEVERLY Defendants CONSUMER WARRANTY ACT; 17 UNLAWFUL, UNFA FRAUDULENT BUSINESS ACTS 18 AND/OR PRACTICES; AND VIOLATION OF THE VEHICLE 19 CODE §11711, ET SEQ. 20 21 Plaintiff, Katherine Torres alleges, as follows, against Defendant Maria del Carmen Ordonez dba \ \ q 22 Discount and Wholesale Auto (“Ordonez” or “Dealership”), Defendant JB Financial; Dé BehanGcn itdane Gr 47 23 American Insurance Company (GAIC), and Does | through 10, on information etic fnped 20) &q s27o a an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances: foo aa cHx. se 25me JURISDICTION AND VENUE ano aaa 26 1 This Court has jurisdiction over all causes of action asserted herein pursuangto the™ 3 27 California Constitution, Article VI, Section 10, because this case is a cause not given by stanite to other eaaa 2 28 trial courts. bboao as Beaaq a 1 COMPLAINT