arrow left
arrow right
  • ORTHO MATTRESS INC VS BEDDING PROS LLC ET AL Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ORTHO MATTRESS INC VS BEDDING PROS LLC ET AL Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

SB tor ls of Califomia unty of bos Angeles APR 12 2018 Craig J. Mariam (SBN: 225280). Sherri R. C; uve OfficerClerk cmariam@grsm.com By. JamesE. Hawley (SBN: 299723) Deputy jhawley@grsm.com GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 633 West Fifth Street, 52nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Phone: (213) 576-5000 Facsimile: (877) 306-0043 Attorneys for Plaintiff Ortho Mattress, Inc. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 ORTHO MATTRESS, INC., a California ) Case No. BC665853 Corporation, 11 ) Honorable Mel Red Recana Plaintiff, Pur Nes Zas eae 12 ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR: gx Vv. ) 30 13 q) Intentional Interference with Aa BEDDING PROS, LLC dba US-MATTRESS, a) Prospective Economic Advantage; 14 Michigan Limited Liability Company: Pe OE MATTRESS USA, INC. dba US-MATTRESS, (2) Negligent Interference With nud Prospective Economic Advantage; 15 a Michigan Corporation; and DOES 1 through } as 25, inclusive. G3) False Advertising Under Cal. Bus. ze ZS 16 (4) & Prof. Code §§ 17500, et seq. Unfair Competition Under Cal. Defendants. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq. 17 6) Common Law Unfair Competition 18 19 20 Plaintiff Ortho Mattress, Inc. (“Ortho Mattress”), for its Complaint against defendants 21 Bedding Pros, LLC dba US-Mattress, Mattress USA, Inc. dba US-Mattress (together with 22 Bedding Pros, LLC, “US-Mattress”), and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive (collectively, 23 “Defendants”), alleges as follows: 24 INTRODUCTION I 1? 25 1 Defendants are out-of-state mattress retailers that are unfairly competing against bo = = 26 California competitors including and specifically Ortho Mattress by misleading California 27 consumers into believing that their products are less costly than they actually are. 28 Mi 1- FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ORLGY NAL