Answer: SHAYAN FADAEE VS UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC ET AL

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                ORIGINAL
                                                                                                FILED
                                                                                             for Court of
                                                                                              intv of Los Anaeles
            Tracey L Angelopoulos, Esq. (Bar No. 220095)
            Jessica G. Heppenstall, Esq. (Bar No. 259489)                                     JAN 02 2018
            TYSON & MENDES,
            5661 La Jolla Boulevard                                               SherriR.           xecu ve   OfficarClerk
            La Jolla, CA 92037                                                    By.
                                                                                                                      Deputy
            Telephone: (858) 459-4400

            Attorneys for Defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC, RASIER-CA, LLC




                                  SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                                                COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

      10

      1     SHAYAN FADAEE,                                          Case No. BC681145
                                                                    [Complaint Filed: October 26, 2017]
      12                   Plaintiff,
                                                                    RASIER-CA, LLC’S ANSWER TO
     13            Vv.                                              COMPLAINT
           UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a
     14    corporation; RASIER, LLC, a California                   Judge:        Hon. Holly J. Fujie
           company; RASIER-CA, LLC, a California                    Dept:         98
     1S

     16
           and Dan’ y; DAVID MOOSARI, an individual;
                 OES 1 through 10, inclusive,
                                                                    Trial Date:         April 26, 2019
                         Defendants.
     17

     18

     19

     20            COMES     NOW,       Defendant RASIER-CA,       LLC   (hereinafter “Defendant”), severing itself

     21    from all other co-defendants, and answering the Complaint on file herein as follows:
     22            1       Inasmuch as the Complaint is not verified under the provisions of Section 431.30 of
     23    the California Code of Civil Procedure, this answering Defendant denies generally each, every and
"2
ro   24    all of the allegations in said Complaint, and the whole thereof, including denial of all sums and
“2   25    amounts alleged, to be alleged or otherwise.
6
pb   26    Mt
oa   27    Wt
     28    Mt
                                                               1
                                            RASIER-CA, LLC’S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT