On June 06, 2017 a
Complaint,Petition
was filed
involving a dispute between
Industria Insurance Company Ltd,
and
Dhl Express Usa Incorporation Dism'D,
Dhl Global Forwarding Doe1,
Mayor Logistics Incorporation,
Xpo Logistics Llc Doe2,
for Insurance Coverage (not complex) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
@ hOO\S @ AOOI\XD
ORIGINAL
>
FREEMAN MATHIS & GARY LLP
FILED
Superior Court of California
JON H. TISDALE
/ Bar No. 096977 County of Los Angeles
JASON C. DINEROS
/ Bar No. 285880
550 South Hope Street, 22nd Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627 JUN 0.6 2017
(213)615-7000; FAX: (213) 615-7100
Sherri R. Carter, Exec Officer/Clerk
Attorneys for Plaintiff
INDUSTRIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
By. tt Ade , Deputy
cS) Moses Soto
[ny SS M ecKey
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
10
ll INDUSTRIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ) Case No. BC 664188
12 Plaintiff, ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
VS.
13 ) 1. NEGLIGENCE
DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC., a corporation ) 2. NEGLIGENCE PER SE UNDER
14 MAYOR LOGISTICS, INC., a corporation; and ) CALIFORNIA CODE OF
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive;, ) REGULATIONS, TITLE 13, DIV. 2
1S CHAP. 7, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 1300(b),|
Defendants ) INCORPORATING CODE OF
15 ) FEDERAL REGULATIONS, TITLE 49,
PART 393, SECTION 126(c)-(d)
17
18 Plaintiff INDUSTRIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. (hereinafter "Plaintiff") alleges
19 against all Defendants as follows.
29 1. Plaintiff was and is at all times mentioned herein an insurance carrier authorized to do business
21 and doing business in the State of California under the laws of the State of California.
22 Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendant DHL EXPRESS (USA),
23 INC. (hereinafter "DHL") is and was at all times mentioned herein a corporation authorized to
sp ee
24 SEF
do business and doing business in the State of California under the laws of the State of memn Pa
+h o6
25 California. gQoomhss
Br o oh
Bron oa ae om
26 Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendant MAYORSLOGISTIGS,”, -”
am
27 INC. (hereinafter “Mayor”) is and was at all times mentioned herein a corporation author}zeg' “4
Ss
do business and doing business in the State of California under the laws of the State of a a oo
28 a
-l a o
we
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
in
4291161.1 16042-0000102 88H
238
as
Sees
Soag aa
Document Filed Date
June 06, 2017
Case Filing Date
June 06, 2017
Category
Insurance Coverage (not complex) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 12/13/2017
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
@ hOO\S @ AOOI\XD ORIGINAL > FREEMAN MATHIS & GARY LLP FILED Superior Court of California JON H. TISDALE / Bar No. 096977 County of Los Angeles JASON C. DINEROS / Bar No. 285880 550 South Hope Street, 22nd Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-2627 JUN 0.6 2017 (213)615-7000; FAX: (213) 615-7100 Sherri R. Carter, Exec Officer/Clerk Attorneys for Plaintiff INDUSTRIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. By. tt Ade , Deputy cS) Moses Soto [ny SS M ecKey SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 ll INDUSTRIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ) Case No. BC 664188 12 Plaintiff, ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES VS. 13 ) 1. NEGLIGENCE DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC., a corporation ) 2. NEGLIGENCE PER SE UNDER 14 MAYOR LOGISTICS, INC., a corporation; and ) CALIFORNIA CODE OF DOES 1 through 50, inclusive;, ) REGULATIONS, TITLE 13, DIV. 2 1S CHAP. 7, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 1300(b),| Defendants ) INCORPORATING CODE OF 15 ) FEDERAL REGULATIONS, TITLE 49, PART 393, SECTION 126(c)-(d) 17 18 Plaintiff INDUSTRIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. (hereinafter "Plaintiff") alleges 19 against all Defendants as follows. 29 1. Plaintiff was and is at all times mentioned herein an insurance carrier authorized to do business 21 and doing business in the State of California under the laws of the State of California. 22 Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendant DHL EXPRESS (USA), 23 INC. (hereinafter "DHL") is and was at all times mentioned herein a corporation authorized to sp ee 24 SEF do business and doing business in the State of California under the laws of the State of memn Pa +h o6 25 California. gQoomhss Br o oh Bron oa ae om 26 Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendant MAYORSLOGISTIGS,”, -” am 27 INC. (hereinafter “Mayor”) is and was at all times mentioned herein a corporation author}zeg' “4 Ss do business and doing business in the State of California under the laws of the State of a a oo 28 a -l a o we COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES in 4291161.1 16042-0000102 88H 238 as Sees Soag aa