arrow left
arrow right
  • Autovest LLC -v- Jaimes et al Print Rule 3.740 Collections -Reduced Filing Fee Limited  document preview
  • Autovest LLC -v- Jaimes et al Print Rule 3.740 Collections -Reduced Filing Fee Limited  document preview
  • Autovest LLC -v- Jaimes et al Print Rule 3.740 Collections -Reduced Filing Fee Limited  document preview
  • Autovest LLC -v- Jaimes et al Print Rule 3.740 Collections -Reduced Filing Fee Limited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

BRYANT BURNSTAD, SBN 297286 . F ' LTEFRL,FORN,A RESURGENCE LEGAL GROUP, PC “$35595 8935:» BERNAaomo 10805 Holder Street, Suite 167 SAN BERNARW‘ “‘STR'CT Cypress, CA 90630 (T) 877/440-0860 (F) 714/226—0024 FEB 2 6 2021 llllIll||||llllllllllIIIIIIIIIIEIIIIIIIIIIIH EMAIL: CAAttomey@ResurgenceLegal.com f NONUIAUJN Refer to File Number: TP097840 W m D Attorney for Plaintiff N'C LE CAR ’ T‘ SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, SAN BERNARDINO COURTHOUSE JUDICIAL DISTRICT SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT CIVIL DIVISION R Q ? b, _, l c1, Lg% AUTOVEST LLC, ) CASENOCN SB 21059‘l5 ) Plaintiff, ) COMPLAINT FOR MONEY ) v. ) 1. Breach of Contract ) 2. Open Book DIMAS JAIMES; ) 3. Account Stated GABRIELA OROZCO, ) A8“ and DOES through 15 1 inclusive, ) Limited Jurisdiction ) [Demand Amount: $4,858.9 1] “X93 Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) GENERAL ALLEGATIONS l. At all times mentioned herein, Plaintiff AUTOVEST LLC was, and now is a LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, duly organized and existing under and by Virtue ofthe state 0f its formation and at all times herein and is successor-in-interest ofAUTOMOTIVE CREDIT CORPORATION, and is qualified t0 conduct business in the State of California. 2. The true names and capacities 0fDefendant(s), DOES 1 through 15, inclusive, are unknown to Plaintiff at this time, who therefore sues said Defendant(s) by such fictitious names. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that each Defendant named as a DOE is responsible for each and every obligation hereinafter set forth. 3. Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant(s), 0r some of them, reside in the above-cited Judicial District. The obligation sued upon is not commercial in nature and is not subject to the provisions of ] COMPLAINT FESR MaNEY