On March 27, 2023 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Gayla Smith Individually And As Executor Of The Estate Of Joyce Faye Dacke,
Roberts, Harold,
Roberts, Jeff,
Snider, Melissa,
and
Fryfogle, Sterling,
Fryfogle, Susan Weinzettle,
Weinzettle, Cameron Paul,
Weinzettle, Matthew,
for Real Property - Other
in the District Court of Montgomery County.
Preview
CAUSE NO. 23-03-04432
GAYLA SMITH AS NEXT §
FRIEND OF JOYCE FAYE DACKE § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
§
Plaintiff §
§
§ MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS
§
SUSAN WEINZETTLE FRYFOGLE §
AND STERLING FRYFOGLE §
Defendants § 457 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
FENDANT’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
To : Plaintiff by and through their attorney of record, Conner Bree Tichota, via eFile.
Please find responses to Plaintiff’s request to produce the following documents
pursuant Rule 196 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. If you object to any
particular request or part of a request, please answer all other requests or portions of
requests to which no objection is made.
STEINMANN LAW
COUNSEL AND SERVICES
___/Chris Forbes/______
Bert Steinmann
Texas Bar Number 24013561
Christopher Cole Forbes
Texas Bar Number 24034000
103 W. Phillips St.
Conroe, TX 77301
Tel. (441-8675
Fax. (936756-3304
Steinmannlaw@gmail.com
Counsel for Defendants
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on August 2, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served to
each attorney of record, via e-file, pursuant to Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 21 and 21a.
________/Chris Forbes/
Chistopher Cole Forbes
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
Please produce the following documents:
Any and all communication, including but not limited to e-mails, texts, letters, and
video/audio recordings, between Susan Fryfolge (“Susan”) and Gayla Smith
Gayla”) regarding the care of Joyce Faye Dacke (“Dacke”) from January of 2022 to
present.
RESPONSE:Objection to this r equest as being overreaching and broad.
Subject to this objection, there are no documents responsive to this request.
Defendant Susan Fryfogle and Plaintiff Gayla Smith’s communications re in
person or over the phone and not in a recorded format that can be produced
Any and all communication, including but not limited to e-mails, texts, letters, and
video/audio recordings, between Sterling Fryfolge (“Terry”) and Gayla regarding the
care of Dacke from January of 2022 to present.
RESPONSE:Objection to this request as being overreaching and broad.
Subject to this objection, there are no documents responsive to this request.
Defendant Sterling Fryfogle and Plaintiff Gayla Smith’s communications were
in person or over the phone and not in a recorded format that can be produced.
Any and all communication, including but not limited to e-mails, texts, letters, and
video/audio recordings, between Susan and Dacke regarding the joint bank account
they shared from Jan. 2019 until April 28, 2023 (“Date of death”).
RESPONSE:Objection to this request as being overreaching and broad.
Subject to this objection, there are no documents responsive to this request.
Defendant Susan Fryfogle and Joyce Faye Dacke’s communications were in
person or over the phone and not in a recorded format that can be produced.
Any and all communication, including but not limited to e-mails, texts, letters, and
video/audio recordings, between Terry and Dacke regarding the 2006 GMC Truck.
RESPONSE:Objection to this request as being overreaching and broad.
Subject to this objection, there are no documents responsive to this request.
Defendant Sterling Fryfogle and Joyce Faye Dacke’s communications were in
person or over the phone and not in a recorded format that can be produced.
Any title, registration, and insurance information regarding the 2006 GMC Truck.
RESPONSE:Objection to this request as being overreaching and broad.
Subject to this objection, the following documents produced are responsive to
this request.
FRYFOGLE 001
Any receipts for purchase of the 2006 GMC Truck.
RESPONSE:Objection to this request as being overreaching and broad.
Subject to this objection, there are no documents responsive to this request.
Any receipts for goods or services purchased by Susan using the joint accounts she
shared with Dacke from 2019 until Date of Death.
RESPONSE:Objection to this request as being overreaching and broad.
Subject to this objection, there are no documents responsive to this request.
Anycommunication including but not limited to e mails, texts, letters, and
video/audio recordings, between Susan and Gayla regardingreturningtheir mother’s
wedding ring.
RESPONSE:Objection to this request as being overreaching and broad.
Subject to this objection, there are no documents responsive to this request.
Defendant Susan Fryfogle and Plaintiff Gayla Smith’s communications were in
person or over the phone and not in a recorded format that can be produced.
Any communication including but not limited to e mails, texts, letters, and
video/audio recordings, between Susan and Dacke regarding returning Dacke’s
wedding ring.
RESPONSE:Objection to this request as being overreaching and broad.
Subject to this objection, there are no documents responsive to this request.
Defendant Susan Fryfogle and Joyce Faye Dacke’s communications were in
person or over the phone and not in a recorded format that can be produced.
Any communication including but not limited to e mails, texts, letters, and
video/audio recordings, between Susan and Dacke regarding the Jan. 28, 2022 Deed.
RESPONSE:Objection to this request as being overreaching and broad.
Subject to this objection, there are no documents responsive to this request.
Defendant Susan Fryfogle and Joyce Faye Dacke’s communications were in
person or over the phone and not in a recorded format that can be produced.
Any photos intended to be presented or used at trial.
RESPONSE:No documents are responsive to this request.
Fryfogle 001