On January 19, 2018 a
Appellate Materials
was filed
involving a dispute between
Benedon & Serlin Attorney At Law,
Carranza Lillian L.,
and
L.A. Depositions Inc.,
Los Angeles City Of,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
FENFTAFIVE RULING
— _ — ~ —
HEARING DATE: May 31, 2019 TRIAL: May 5, 2020
FILED
Superior Court of Californi
CASE: Lillian L. Carranza y. City of Los Angele: County of Los Angeles
a
CASE NO.: BC690761 MAY 3 1 2019
eee
Sherri R. Cy ter, Executive Office
Opposed: Yes. s/Clerk of Court
By.
» Deputy
Anthony te
MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING THE COURT REPORTER TO PREPARE
THE TRANSCRIPT OF IN CAMERA PROCEEDING AND TO FILE TRANSCRIPT
UNDER SEAL WITH THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR PURPOSES OF A WRIT
PETITION
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Lillian L. Carranza
RESPONDING PARTY(S): Defendant City of Los Angeles
PROOF OF SERVICE:
e Correct Address: Yes.
e 16/21 (CCP § 1005(b)): OK. Served by personal delivery on May 20, 2019 per May 17,
2019 ex parte order shortening time
DENY motion to order transcript sealed;
GRANT motion to order court reporter to prepare transcript on an expedited basis.
ANALYSIS
Motion to Direct Court Reporter to Prepare Transcript and To File Transcript under Seal
with Court of Appeal
Plaintiff moves for an order directing the court reporter to prepare the transcript of the
April 10, 2019 in camera proceeding and to file the transcript under seal with the Court of
Appeal for purposes of a writ petition.
Law enforcement personnel files reviewed by the court in camera pursuant to Pitchess are
confidential by law. See, e.g., People v. Galland (2008) 45 Cal.4th 354, 367. Per CRC Rule
8.45, then, transcripts of in camera Pitchess hearings are “confidential records.” A sealing order
is not required for confidential records submitted to the Court of Appeal; rather, there is an
independent procedure for confidential records.
(a) Application The rules in this article establish general requirements
regarding sealed and confidential records in appeals and original proceedings
Document Filed Date
May 31, 2019
Case Filing Date
January 19, 2018
Status
Summary Judgment 12/16/2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
FENFTAFIVE RULING — _ — ~ — HEARING DATE: May 31, 2019 TRIAL: May 5, 2020 FILED Superior Court of Californi CASE: Lillian L. Carranza y. City of Los Angele: County of Los Angeles a CASE NO.: BC690761 MAY 3 1 2019 eee Sherri R. Cy ter, Executive Office Opposed: Yes. s/Clerk of Court By. » Deputy Anthony te MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING THE COURT REPORTER TO PREPARE THE TRANSCRIPT OF IN CAMERA PROCEEDING AND TO FILE TRANSCRIPT UNDER SEAL WITH THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR PURPOSES OF A WRIT PETITION MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Lillian L. Carranza RESPONDING PARTY(S): Defendant City of Los Angeles PROOF OF SERVICE: e Correct Address: Yes. e 16/21 (CCP § 1005(b)): OK. Served by personal delivery on May 20, 2019 per May 17, 2019 ex parte order shortening time DENY motion to order transcript sealed; GRANT motion to order court reporter to prepare transcript on an expedited basis. ANALYSIS Motion to Direct Court Reporter to Prepare Transcript and To File Transcript under Seal with Court of Appeal Plaintiff moves for an order directing the court reporter to prepare the transcript of the April 10, 2019 in camera proceeding and to file the transcript under seal with the Court of Appeal for purposes of a writ petition. Law enforcement personnel files reviewed by the court in camera pursuant to Pitchess are confidential by law. See, e.g., People v. Galland (2008) 45 Cal.4th 354, 367. Per CRC Rule 8.45, then, transcripts of in camera Pitchess hearings are “confidential records.” A sealing order is not required for confidential records submitted to the Court of Appeal; rather, there is an independent procedure for confidential records. (a) Application The rules in this article establish general requirements regarding sealed and confidential records in appeals and original proceedings