Motion,Ex Parte: Cheung, Susan et al vs. Thomas B Pushak Dentist and Owner of Family Dentistry Lexington MA et al

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Date Filed 3/9/2023 12:22 AM
Superior Court - Middlesex
Docket Number 2281CV04359

                                                           19
                                             COMMONWEALTH          OF MASSACHUSETTS

                   MIDDLESEX, ss.                                              SUPERIOR COURT
                                                                               DOCKET NO. 2281CV04359




                   SUSAN CHEUNG, AND
                   CHRISTOPHER CHEUNG                                                   Mar 9 2023


                                            Plaintiff,

                  Vv.                                                              RE

                   THOMAS B PUSCHAK               and
                   CAROL PUSCHAK
                                                                                          3/9/23
                                            Defendant.


                        MOTION     TO DEMAND      DEFENDNATS IN COMPLIANT WITH SUPERIOR COURT
                                                  RULE 9A ESPECIALLY SECTION 5


                        The Plaintiff Susan Cheung and Christopher Cheung demand defendants in compliant with

                   superior court Rule 9A in their motions and Memorandum

                          1    MOTION OF THE DEFENDANTS; THOMAS PUSCHAK AND CAROL PUSCHAK

                               TO STRIKE AND IMPOUND THE COMPLAINT OF THE PLAINTIFFS, SUSAN

                               CHEUNG AND CHRISTOPHER CHEUNG AND FOR AN ORDR REQUIRING THE

                               PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH MASS GEN. L. 231, §60L AND

                               MASS.GEN.L.CH.231, §60C. OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE ,FOR A MORE DEFINITE

                               STATEMENT PURSUANT TO MASS.R.CIV.P.12 (¢)

                          2.   DEFENDNATS, THOMAS AND CAROL PUSCHAK’S MEMORANDUM                       OF LAW

                               IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMETN

                               PURSUANT TO MASS. R. CIV. P. 12(e)
Date Filed 3/9/2023 12:22 AM
Superior Court - Middlesex
Docket Number 2281CV04359




                        3.     MOTION OF THE DEFENDANTS, THOMAS PUSCHAK AND CAROL PUSCHAK

                               TO STRIKE THE COMPLIANT OF THE PLANTIFFS, SUSAN CHEUNG AND

                               CHRISTOPHER CHEUNG FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULE 12 ( E)

                               ORDER

                               They are all not in compliant with Superior Court Rule 9A, section 5

                               Superior Court Rule 9A section 5:

                       (5) Format and length of all papers except exhibits


                             All papers addressed by this Rule 9A, except exhibits, must conform to the following

                             requirements:


                             (i) Paper size. Papers must be on 8 1/2" by 11" paper.


                             (ii) Typeface. Papers must be in 12-point, double-spaced type. The caption, footnotes, and

                             indented quotations may be single-spaced in 12-point type.


                             (iii) Title. The title of each document must appear on the first page next to or below the

                             caption.


                             (iv) Length. The memorandum supporting the motion or cross-motion and the

                             memorandum in opposition may not exceed 20 pages, and the reply may not exceed 5

                             pages. Any appendix permitted by Superior Court Rule 9C(b) is not included in the page

                             limit. Nor is an addendum that sets forth, verbatim and without argument, pertinent

                             excerpts from key documents, statutes, regulations or the like.
Date Filed 3/9/2023 12:22 AM
Superior Court - Middlesex
Docket Number 2281CV04359




                           (v) Email addresses. Each attorney or self-represented party filing motion or opposition

                           papers must include his or her email address on the papers, or certify in the filing that he or

                           she does not have an email address.


                               So the Plaintiffs Susan Cheung and Christopher Cheung strike the above defendants’

                               motions and Memorandum not in compliant with Suoerior court Rule 9A!

                               The defendnats must dismiss your above motions and Memorandum not in compliant

                               with Superior court Rule 9A, as you use different format in all paper section not in

                               compliant with Superior Court Rule 9A, so the Defendnats must dismiss your motions

                               and Memorandum not in compliant with Superior Court Rule 9A, and you can redo them

                               in compliant with the Superior Court Rule 9A; This is not fair to the injured party,

                               plaintiffs, in the case and court trial!

                                                                             The Plaintiffs
                                                                              Susan Cheung     Susan       Mew
                                                                              Christopher Cheung
                                                                              Phone: 7816401770
                                                                              Email: susandingcheung@gmail.com