On January 25, 2018 a
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
was filed
involving a dispute between
Alva Joanne,
and
Allstate Indemnity Company,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COmRT OF CALIFORNIA
e Reserved for Clerk's Filing Stamp
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FLLED
I" COURTHOUSE ADDRESS: Superior Court of California
Counn y of Los Anesles.
1111 NORTH HILL STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
PLAINTIFF: AUG 24 2018
DEFENDANT:
GOMN ALVAR shern k. Cais Cle
AUATATE \NOGMNITY Os PNY ©
te,
- +
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER ECE ECA ATF
1 Case Management Conference
fet the parties have complied with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq., and have filed case management statements on Judicial
Council form CM-110.
The case management conference is continued to at 8:30 a.m. or
a.m. Oo p.m. due to one or both parties’ non-compliance with California Rules of Court, rule
3.720 et seq is ordered to show cause at said conference
why monetary sanctions should not be imposed for non-compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq
2. Parties
“LJ thThere Oi is i is not oO will be a cross-complaint(s) in this matter. 1
O All named Defendants/Cross-Defendants have been served and have appeared, been defaulted or dismissed.
QO Plaintiff is ordered to show cause on why sanctions, including dismissal
should not be imposed for failure to cause entry of Default/Default Judgment.
O With the agreement of Plaintiff/Cross-Complainant, all unserved Defendants/Cross-Defendants and Does/Roes are
dismissed/severed as of
oO Plainiiff/Cross-Complainant is ordered to show cause on why Sanctions including dismissal, should not be
imposed for failure to serve a defendant/cross-defendant in compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq
3. Alternative Dispute Resolutio
The case is referred [_] ordered] to (C] arbitration 1] mediation [J neutral evaluation}
Voluntary settlement conference through ([_] court services [] private neutral]. (See L.A.S.C. Local Rules, Chepter 12.)
The ADR process must be completed by
A post-A\pep’ conference is set for_“3 -) ‘L 14
LS.
“EB aint
a
/Defendant has demanded jury and will post jury fees. (Code Civ. Proc., § 631.)
final status conference is set for ~ - at 8:30 a.m. or at Cam. Cem
@ case is set for jury/court trial on A~\A at 4-0 Gam. pm.
C] Time estimated for trial is days.
The identity of trial counsel is: CJ set forth in parties’ case management statements (form CM-110)
|
Ol as follows: For Plaintiff: For Defendant
5. Other Issues
Pursuant to oO stipulation Oo court order, the case is reclassified to limited jurisdiction
{_] There is a potentially related case, number See further order below.
A mandatory settlement conference per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1380, is set for
at a.m. p.m. The parties are ordered to comply with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1380.
O The court further orders as follows
Notice &] is waived oO shall be given by Plaintiff/Defendant oO has been given by delivery of a copy of this order to counsel in open court.
Dated sjzruh Sear
ba
Judidial Officer
pon ROBERT S. DRAPER 1
-ACIV 134 (Rev. 04/09) CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq.
-ASC Approved 09-03
DISTRIBUTION: ORIGINAL — COURT FILE COPIES - PLAINTIFFS & DEFENDANTS,
Document Filed Date
August 22, 2018
Case Filing Date
January 25, 2018
Status
Deemed Complete (No Remand from Federal Court) 03/12/2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SUPERIOR COmRT OF CALIFORNIA e Reserved for Clerk's Filing Stamp COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FLLED I" COURTHOUSE ADDRESS: Superior Court of California Counn y of Los Anesles. 1111 NORTH HILL STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 PLAINTIFF: AUG 24 2018 DEFENDANT: GOMN ALVAR shern k. Cais Cle AUATATE \NOGMNITY Os PNY © te, - + CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER ECE ECA ATF 1 Case Management Conference fet the parties have complied with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq., and have filed case management statements on Judicial Council form CM-110. The case management conference is continued to at 8:30 a.m. or a.m. Oo p.m. due to one or both parties’ non-compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq is ordered to show cause at said conference why monetary sanctions should not be imposed for non-compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq 2. Parties “LJ thThere Oi is i is not oO will be a cross-complaint(s) in this matter. 1 O All named Defendants/Cross-Defendants have been served and have appeared, been defaulted or dismissed. QO Plaintiff is ordered to show cause on why sanctions, including dismissal should not be imposed for failure to cause entry of Default/Default Judgment. O With the agreement of Plaintiff/Cross-Complainant, all unserved Defendants/Cross-Defendants and Does/Roes are dismissed/severed as of oO Plainiiff/Cross-Complainant is ordered to show cause on why Sanctions including dismissal, should not be imposed for failure to serve a defendant/cross-defendant in compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq 3. Alternative Dispute Resolutio The case is referred [_] ordered] to (C] arbitration 1] mediation [J neutral evaluation} Voluntary settlement conference through ([_] court services [] private neutral]. (See L.A.S.C. Local Rules, Chepter 12.) The ADR process must be completed by A post-A\pep’ conference is set for_“3 -) ‘L 14 LS. “EB aint a /Defendant has demanded jury and will post jury fees. (Code Civ. Proc., § 631.) final status conference is set for ~ - at 8:30 a.m. or at Cam. Cem @ case is set for jury/court trial on A~\A at 4-0 Gam. pm. C] Time estimated for trial is days. The identity of trial counsel is: CJ set forth in parties’ case management statements (form CM-110) | Ol as follows: For Plaintiff: For Defendant 5. Other Issues Pursuant to oO stipulation Oo court order, the case is reclassified to limited jurisdiction {_] There is a potentially related case, number See further order below. A mandatory settlement conference per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1380, is set for at a.m. p.m. The parties are ordered to comply with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1380. O The court further orders as follows Notice &] is waived oO shall be given by Plaintiff/Defendant oO has been given by delivery of a copy of this order to counsel in open court. Dated sjzruh Sear ba Judidial Officer pon ROBERT S. DRAPER 1 -ACIV 134 (Rev. 04/09) CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.720 et seq. -ASC Approved 09-03 DISTRIBUTION: ORIGINAL — COURT FILE COPIES - PLAINTIFFS & DEFENDANTS,