arrow left
arrow right
  • BMO Harris Bank N.A. vs. Navdeep Kang06 Unlimited - Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • BMO Harris Bank N.A. vs. Navdeep Kang06 Unlimited - Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • BMO Harris Bank N.A. vs. Navdeep Kang06 Unlimited - Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • BMO Harris Bank N.A. vs. Navdeep Kang06 Unlimited - Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • BMO Harris Bank N.A. vs. Navdeep Kang06 Unlimited - Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • BMO Harris Bank N.A. vs. Navdeep Kang06 Unlimited - Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
						
                                

Preview

SUPERIOR’COURT OF CALIFORNIA - COUNTY OF FRESNO E [LEAECGWfl Civil Limited - Non-Limifed OrderAnaohmanl Malglzlllfi TITLEOF CASE: BMO Harris Ban N.A. vs. Navdeep‘ Kang W ”l lHl “Ml!" llllllllllfl Ccse Number. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MlNUTES/ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE / _ \\ . H D t 17CEC603721 Court Clerk: K.‘ Daves S. Lopez R.Smith eonngueosg'ay I May 29 2°18 " Department: Conference Room 305 Appearing Paflies: " Plaintiff: _[ ]Appeoring Counsel: £4 . LQS H; fig Sf)! ‘ 1 [ ]Appeoring Defendant [ ]Appeoring Counsel: [ ]A'ppearing V g \3/ ‘ ‘ ' UL‘ __" 0Q ‘ ' [uZEnfinued To?t’§® Lg 01‘ E2 - 6.91pm. inRoom 230‘) for: [ ]Service on all defendants. [ ]Nofice of Settlement to be filed. [ ]Ploinfiff/Cross——ploinfiff sio’res he/she willdismiss ' forthwith. Mfiswerio be filed. [ ]Oiher wbgfouli/Judgmem‘ To be filed. [ ]Personol injury case. LimiI‘ed Civil‘oniy. I ]Designdied cs Uninsured Moiorisi cdse. [ ]Porfies presenisfipuloieihaicase wiilToke [ 112—18 [ ]18—24 months To dispose. [ ]Jury Trial requested by [ ]quinfiff [ ]Defendoni. [ ]Coun‘ Trial:appearing por’ries waive Their rights ’ro CI jury Trial.Non--appearing bodies are deemed To have waived their rights to a jury Trialand I‘ohave conseni‘ed 1‘0I‘he date set for Trial. [ ]Couri Reporter fees must be paid To the clerk's office prior I‘ocommencement of in'ol. [ ]Esiimoied fime foririol is days; [ ]Triolisset for - oi - a. m. lb.m in Department " [ ]TriaiReadiness is‘sei for V GT ' o.m .lb m in Deportmeni m in ' ‘ [ ]Mondatory Settlement Cohferehce isset for . oi o. m. lb. Room 575. [']The Sefilemeni Conference Statement is due 10 days prior To The Se’rilemeni Conference. []Service of wrifien notice of The orders‘mode herein is waived by: . ‘ [ ]AIIponies [ 1 v I [ ]The court orders all porfies 10 engage in some form of'Aiierndfive Dispute Resolution, such as mediation. I This Aliernofive Dispute Resolution must be completed by (within 180 days after the Case Management Conference, or prior to the Mandatory Settlement Conference, whichever Is earlier). Fdilure to do so may result'In the c'ourt'Imposing sanctions, unless excused by the court Upon o timely showing of good cause by written declaration. you if hove ony questions you moy contact the ADR Department ot 457- i909. A listof the mediators ond stipulation forms ore ovoiloble on the Court' s website. http: //www. fresno. courts. co oov/olternotive dispute resolution/ CV48” mm Mandatory Form CAsE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MINUTES/ORDER To'SHow CAUSE ‘ - ~ C‘V“C°de 0f mews 63‘ Local Rule 3 TITLEOF CASE: CASE NUMBER: BMO Harris Bank N.A. vs. Navdeep Kang ' 17CECGos721 Order to Show Causé TO: ' You ore hereby ordered 10 appear in person on of o. m. /p. m. In Department 404 of the above court located of 1130 'O Street, Fresno, California, To show cause why you should no’r be sanctioned for: [ ]foilure 10 appear of the Case Management Conference by [ ]Plainfiff [ ]Defendonf [ ]Bofh [ ]foilure I‘oserve alldefendonfls) within 60 days. Plaintiff Is required to diligently ofiempi service of oil defendonfls). Failure to serve all defendanfls) by The order 10 show cause hearing date will result In additional sanctions unless diligent effort 10 serve CIII defendants is shown. [ ]f0ilure io request entry of defouli/judgmen’r. If defendanfls) answer 0nd the case is ot'Issue prior to the Order to Show Cause Hearing, plaintiff must immediately contact the clerk‘s office 0t (559) 457—1 900 to reschedule the Case Management Conference and vacate the Order to Show Cause Hearing. [ ]foi|ure to fileon ADR Stipulation ot least iO days prior to the Case Management Conference. [ ]foilure to fileon ADR Report at least 10 days prior to the Mandatory Settlement Conference. [ ]foilure to serve oli defendants with the Notice of Case Management Conference. [ ]other Date: Judge of the Superior Court Your personal appearance is required at the Order to Show Cause Hearing. Special appearances on your behalf are not allowed. Telephonic appearances are not allowed. CV-18b iO—0 Manda“; R‘m CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MINUTES/ORDER To SHow CAUSE CW" C°de 0fPmedvre 631 Local Rule 3 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA - COUNTY OF FRESNO FOR COURTUSE ONLY Civil Department, Central Division 1 130 "O" Streét Fresno, California 93724-0002 (559) 457—2000 TITLE 0F CASE: BMO Harris Bank N.A. vs. Navdeep Kang CLERK'S CERTIFICATE 0F MAILING C§§E0E%“é%§§§1 | certify thatIam not a party to this cause and that a true cdpy of the: Case Management Conference Minutes/Order was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. |am readily familiar with this court’s practice for collectingand processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence isplaced for collection and mailing, itisdeposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of mailing: Fresno, California 93724-0002 On Date: 06/01/2018 Clerk, by ,Deputy |.Herrera Joshua Lopez Wong, Fleming 420 Walnut Avenue San Diego, CA 92103 D Cterk's Certificate of Mailing Additional Address Page Attached TGN-06b R08-06 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING