arrow left
arrow right
  • YUYI JIANG VS. ARNOLD CHEN Othr Breach Contr/Warr-not Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • YUYI JIANG VS. ARNOLD CHEN Othr Breach Contr/Warr-not Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/18/2021 12:29 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Scott,Deputy Clerk MC–052 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, state bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Daniel A. Friedlander, Esq. (206978) To keep other people from Law Offices of Daniel Friedlander seeing what you entered on 29800 Agoura Road, Suite 101 your form, please press the Agoura Hills, CA 91301 Clear This Form button at the TELEPHONE NO.: 805-409-8710 FAX NO.: dan@leglr.com end of the form when finished. ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendants Arnold Chen and Timmy La NAME OF COURT: Los Angeles County Superior Court STREET ADDRESS: 300 East Olive MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: Burbank, CA 91502 BRANCH NAME: Burbank Courthouse CASE NAME: Yuyi Jiang v. Arnold Chen, et al. CASE NUMBER: EC067678 HEARING DATE: June 18, 2021 DEPT.: B TIME: 8:30 a.m. DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF ATTORNEY'S BEFORE HON.: John J. Kralik MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL—CIVIL DATE ACTION FILED: 12/27/2017 TRIAL DATE: May 24, 2021 1. Attorney and Represented Party. Attorney (name): Daniel A. Friedlander, Esq. is presently counsel of record for (name of party): Timmy La in the above-captioned action or proceeding. 2. Reasons for Motion. Attorney makes this motion to be relieved as counsel under Code of Civil Procedure section 284(2) instead of filing a consent under section 284(1) for the following reasons (describe): In accordance with Rule 3-700(A)(2) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, I have taken multiple and repeated steps to avoid reasonably foreseeable prejudice to the rights of the clients before filing this motion, including giving due notice to the clients allowing the clients time to retain the employment of another attorney. I am familiar with the provisions in Rule 3-700(C), and there are facts and circumstances that satisfy the requirements in more than one subsection, even when only one subsection is necessary to allow the withdrawal. To protect the attorney-client privilege I cannot recite the detail here. If the Court desires I can most certainly provide the facts and circumstance to the Court in chambers without opposing counsel present with the acknowledgment that such communication is not intended and does not waive the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. Continued on Attachment 2. 3. Service a. Attorney has (1) personally served the client with copies of the motion papers filed with this declaration. A copy of the proof of service will be filed with the court at least 5 days before the hearing. (2) ✔ served the client by mail at the client's last known address with copies of the motion papers served with this declaration. b. If the client has been served by mail at the client's last known address, attorney has (1) confirmed within the past 30 days that the address is current (a) by mail, return receipt requested. (b) by telephone. (c) by conversation. (d) by other means (specify): (Continued on reverse) Page 1 of 2 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Code of Civil Procedure, § 284; Judicial Council of California DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF ATTORNEY'S Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362 MC-052 [Rev. January 1, 2007] MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL—CIVIL www.courtinfo.ca.gov