On December 27, 2017 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Chen Arnold,
La Timmy,
Jiang Yuyi,
and
Chen Arnold,
La Timmy,
for Othr Breach Contr/Warr-not Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/18/2021 12:29 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Scott,Deputy Clerk
MC–052
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, state bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Daniel A. Friedlander, Esq. (206978) To keep other people from
Law Offices of Daniel Friedlander seeing what you entered on
29800 Agoura Road, Suite 101 your form, please press the
Agoura Hills, CA 91301 Clear This Form button at the
TELEPHONE NO.: 805-409-8710 FAX NO.: dan@leglr.com end of the form when finished.
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendants Arnold Chen and Timmy La
NAME OF COURT: Los Angeles County Superior Court
STREET ADDRESS: 300 East Olive
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Burbank, CA 91502
BRANCH NAME: Burbank Courthouse
CASE NAME: Yuyi Jiang v. Arnold Chen, et al. CASE NUMBER:
EC067678
HEARING DATE: June 18, 2021
DEPT.: B TIME: 8:30 a.m.
DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF ATTORNEY'S BEFORE HON.: John J. Kralik
MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL—CIVIL
DATE ACTION FILED: 12/27/2017
TRIAL DATE: May 24, 2021
1. Attorney and Represented Party. Attorney (name): Daniel A. Friedlander, Esq.
is presently counsel of record for (name of party): Timmy La
in the above-captioned action or proceeding.
2. Reasons for Motion. Attorney makes this motion to be relieved as counsel under Code of Civil Procedure section 284(2) instead
of filing a consent under section 284(1) for the following reasons (describe):
In accordance with Rule 3-700(A)(2) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, I have taken multiple and
repeated steps to avoid reasonably foreseeable prejudice to the rights of the clients before filing this
motion, including giving due notice to the clients allowing the clients time to retain the employment of
another attorney. I am familiar with the provisions in Rule 3-700(C), and there are facts and
circumstances that satisfy the requirements in more than one subsection, even when only one subsection
is necessary to allow the withdrawal. To protect the attorney-client privilege I cannot recite the detail
here. If the Court desires I can most certainly provide the facts and circumstance to the Court in chambers
without opposing counsel present with the acknowledgment that such communication is not intended and
does not waive the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine.
Continued on Attachment 2.
3. Service
a. Attorney has
(1) personally served the client with copies of the motion papers filed with this declaration. A copy of the proof of service
will be filed with the court at least 5 days before the hearing.
(2) ✔ served the client by mail at the client's last known address with copies of the motion papers served with this declaration.
b. If the client has been served by mail at the client's last known address, attorney has
(1) confirmed within the past 30 days that the address is current
(a) by mail, return receipt requested.
(b) by telephone.
(c) by conversation.
(d) by other means (specify):
(Continued on reverse)
Page 1 of 2
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Code of Civil Procedure, § 284;
Judicial Council of California DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF ATTORNEY'S Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362
MC-052 [Rev. January 1, 2007]
MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL—CIVIL www.courtinfo.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
May 18, 2021
Case Filing Date
December 27, 2017
Category
Othr Breach Contr/Warr-not Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Court Finding - After Court Trial 08/04/2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.