arrow left
arrow right
  • SHARONA YEHUDA VS ARTURO RUBINSTEIN ET AL Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • SHARONA YEHUDA VS ARTURO RUBINSTEIN ET AL Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 Micha e l N. Be rke , Es q. (S BN 81317) LAW OFFICE OF MICHAE L N. BE RKE 2 25001 The Old Roa d, S a nta Cla rita , CA 91381 DEcID C-ILED ,t 1 n nf Te l: (661) 259-1800 I Fa x: (661) 259-1865 " COU ,v of Los Anoeles 3 Ema il: micha e l.be rke @be rke s la w.com DEc 2 9 2017 DEC 29 2017 4 FILING vviNnom Sherri-1cCiettx k;utive T/Gierk 5 Attorne y for J udgme nt Cre ditors J a cob Tikos ky a nd Chica go Title Ins ura nce Co. S i 6 7 8 S UP E R IO R C O UR T O F THE S TATE O F C ALIF O R NIA - 9 F O R THE C O UNTY O F LO S ANG E LE S 10 11 S HARONA YEFITJ bA a s Trus te e of the ) Ca s e No.: BC685560 KE S HE T INTE R v i yO s TRUS T, ) 12 ) NOTICE OF JUDGMENT LIEN (CCP § - P la in tiff, . ) 708.410) 13 ) 14 ) Tikos ky v. Ye huda , LAS C no. LC057468 ) 15 ) ) 16 De fe nda nts. ) 17 TO ALL INTERES TED P ARTIES : 18 P LEAS E TAKE NOTICE, P la intiff a nd J udgme nt Cre ditor, J a cob Tikos ky a nd Chica go 19 Title Ins ura nce Co., purs ua nt to 708.410, he re by cla ims a lie n in the 20 ma tte r e ntitle d Yehuda v. Rubins te in. LAS C no. BC685560, in the a mount of $1,686,302.28 plus 21 inte re s t a t the da ily ra te of $345.36 from the da te of the is s ua nce of the Writ of Exe cution 22 Nove mbe r 18, 2015, a rising from judgme nt e nte re d on July 30, 2003, a me nde d judgme nt e nte re d 23 Octobe r 11, 2005, re ne we d July 30, 2013, a nd a n a ttorne y's fe e orde r file d on Octobe r 6, 2009, • 24 confirme d by the ce rtifie d copie s of the Ame nde d J udgme nt a nd Attorne y's Fe e Orde r a tta che d he re with. The lie n impos e d he re in is upon the inte re s ts of J a cob Tikos ky, individua lly, a nd 26' Chica go Title Insura nce Compa ny, a s Assigne e of the Ame nde d Judgme nt, a nd a ny e ntity 27 cla iming a n inte re s t on the ir be ha lf. The lie n a tta che s to a ny ca us e of a ction of the judgme nt 28 de btor Yora m Ye huda or a ny inte re s t he ma y ha ve the re in, tha t is the s ubje ct of this a ction or 1