arrow left
arrow right
  • JOEL PASCHAL VS KOLLIDER INDUSTRIES LLC ET AL Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JOEL PASCHAL VS KOLLIDER INDUSTRIES LLC ET AL Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/21/2020 07:07 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Gregg,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Daniel A. Platt (SBN 132665) Loeb & Loeb, LLP 10100 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 2200 Los Angeles, CA 90067 TELEPHONE NO.: 310-282-2000 FAX NO. (Optional): E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): dplatt@loeb.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendants Cre8 MBR, LLC and the Williamson Defendants SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill St. MAILING ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill St. CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Joel Paschal DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Kollider Industries, LLC et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: BC697661 (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: August 5, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 34 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Daniel A. Platt INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Cre8 MBR, LLC; Marc Williamson; Brett Williamson; and John Williamson b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): . 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): See Attachment A Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com