arrow left
arrow right
  • NCP Eagle, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company -v- Delta Tech Industries LLC, a California Limited Liability Company et al Print Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited  document preview
  • NCP Eagle, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company -v- Delta Tech Industries LLC, a California Limited Liability Company et al Print Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited  document preview
  • NCP Eagle, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company -v- Delta Tech Industries LLC, a California Limited Liability Company et al Print Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited  document preview
  • NCP Eagle, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company -v- Delta Tech Industries LLC, a California Limited Liability Company et al Print Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

BERRY SILBERBERG STOKES PC JOSHUA C. STOKES, State Bar No. 220214 CAROL M. SILBERBERG, State Bar No. 21 7658 11600 Washington Place, Suite 202C Los Angeles, CA 90066 jstokes@berrysilberberg.com csilberberg@berrysilberberg.com Attorneys for Plaintiff NCP Eagle, LLC BY ’ Ly” ‘\\COLE NV- R wag; g ‘ SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AXE FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO g Case N0. CIVSB2126666 10 NCP EAGLE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Assigned for all purposes t0 Dept. S30 11 The Honorable Brian S. McCarVille Plaintiff, 12 SEPARATE STATEMENT IN SUPPORT 13 VS. 0F MOTION To COMPEL RESPONSES T0 DISCOVERY 14 DELTA TECH INDUSTRIES LLC, a REQUESTS California Limited Liability Company, 15 DURIMEX, INC., a California corporation, (DURIMEX FORM and BOGDAN DURIAN, an individual, INTERROGATORIES) 16 Defendants. 17 Date: July 20, 2023 Time: 8:30 a.m. 18 Dept.: S30 19 Action Filed: September 13, 2021 20 Trial Date: May 6, 2024 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SEPARATE STATENIENT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL (DURIMEX FORM INTERROGATORIES) TO PLAINTIFFS AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that PlaintiffNCP Eagle, LLC (“Plaintiff”), pursuant t0 California Rule of Court 3.1345(a), hereby submits the following Separate Statement in Support of its Motion t0 Compel. Following are the requests for production and the responses received, verbatim, and the reasons why obj ections should be overruled and further responses should be compelled. Sec. 4. Definitions Words in BOLDFACE CAPITALS in these interrogatories are defined as follows: 10 11 INCIDENT means: The contracts referenced in the Complaint and attached to the Complaint as 12 Exhibits and Defendants” failure to pay the amounts outstanding under those agreements. 13 14 YOU OR ANYONE ACTING ON YOUR BEHALF includes you, your agents, your 15 employees, your insurance companies, their agents, their employees, your attorneys, your 16 accountants, your investigators, and anyone else acting on your behalf. 17 18 PERSON includes a natural person, firm, association, organization, partnership, business, trust, 19 limited liability company, corporation, 0r public entity. 20 21 DOCUMENT means a writing, as defined in Evidence Code section 250, and includes the 22 original or a copy of handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostats, photographs, electronically stored information, and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing and form of 23 24 communicating 0r representation, including letters, words, pictures, sounds, or symbols, 0r 25 combinations 0f them. 26 27 ADDRESS means the street address, including the city, state, and zip code. 28 1 SEPARATE STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL (DURIMEX FORM INTERROGATORIES)