On September 24, 2019 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
1Mc Equipment, Llc,
Meyer, James Andrew,
De La Luz, Robert M,
and
1Mc Equipment Llc A California Limited Liability Company,
Mckeegan Enterprises, Inc,
Meyer, James Andrew,
for Breach of Contract/Warranty
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
CHAD T-W PRATT, SR. (SB#149746) F I L E D
CHAD T-W PRATT & Associates, Inc. s'éfimofi 89$; gégfikgfifigm
660 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 1960 SAN BERNARD'NO D'STR'CT
LosAngeles, CA 900‘ 17 JUN 08 2021
(213) 840-CHAD
ChadPrattsrgngaiMom RY
For Defendant, McKeegan Enterprises, Inc.
JACQU U HARM“! QSPHTY
\OOOVONUI-PWN
dba MEI Real Estate Services Corp.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
10
Case N0.: CIVDSl92868O
11
Robert M. De La Luz,
12 SEPARATE STATEMENT
OF MEI AT MOTION
13
FOR SUMMARY
14 JUDGMENT
[CCP 437C ]
15
16 Plaintiff, MSJ Date: 8/3/21
VS. Time: 9:00 am
17
Dept: S-32
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
18
Trial Date: 9-13-21
19
20
JAMES ANDREW MEYER et al., Hon. Judge
Wilfred J.
21 Schneider, Jr.
Defendants.
22
23 And Related Cross-Action
24
25
TO THIS HONORABLE COURT, Hon. Judge Wilfred J. Schneider, Jr. ,
26
27 Plaintiff and counsel ,
Thomas S. Carter, Esq.:
28 1
Separate Statement 0f MEI for Motion for summary judgment by
MEI
\y \y
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Defendant, Mckeegan Enterprises, Inc.,
dba MEI Real Estate Services, C0rp., (hereafter “MEI”) submits its separate statement in
support of its motion for summary judgment per CCP 437C et seq. as follows:
\OOONONUl-PUJNp—A
UNDISPUTED FACTS SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
1. MEI is a commercial real-estate brokerage. Dec. of Dillon para, 1
2. MEI placed 1MC Equipment LLC in the property for a Dec of Dillon para. 2-3
Five year lease and was paid 5% commission .
3. Plaintiff has NO documents t0 support any wrongdoing or. Request for production 1-22.
tortious conduct by MEI. Special Interrogatory #5- 6
4. Plaintiff has no damages as to MEI. Special Interrogatory 19-20
Request for Admission #23
5. Plaintiff has n0 witnesses as to MEI wrongdoing as
to plaintiff. Special interrogatory #21
6. Plaintiff cannot set forth any wrongdoing by MEI. Special Interrogatory 1,2,3, 15,16
NNNNNNNNNHr—‘Hb—d—lp—Ay—IHHH
Form interrogatory 50.1- 50.6
Requests for admission
OOVGUIAUJN—‘OCOOQO‘xUl-AWNHO
4,5,11,13,19, 22
7. Plaintiff has no contract or agreement with MEI. Form interrogatory 50. 1
-
50.6
8. MEI breached no agreement with Plaintiff. Form interrogatory 50.1-50.6
Requests for admission
4,5,11,13,19, 22
9. Plaintiff has the burden of proof. Evid. Code 115
10. Plaintiff cannot set forth cause action for fraud as t0 MEI. Request for admission #5
Request for production #4
Special interrogatory #2
2
Separate Statement of MEI for Motion for summary judgment by
MEI
Document Filed Date
June 08, 2021
Case Filing Date
September 24, 2019
Category
Breach of Contract/Warranty
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
CHAD T-W PRATT, SR. (SB#149746) F I L E D CHAD T-W PRATT & Associates, Inc. s'éfimofi 89$; gégfikgfifigm 660 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 1960 SAN BERNARD'NO D'STR'CT LosAngeles, CA 900‘ 17 JUN 08 2021 (213) 840-CHAD ChadPrattsrgngaiMom RY For Defendant, McKeegan Enterprises, Inc. JACQU U HARM“! QSPHTY \OOOVONUI-PWN dba MEI Real Estate Services Corp. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 10 Case N0.: CIVDSl92868O 11 Robert M. De La Luz, 12 SEPARATE STATEMENT OF MEI AT MOTION 13 FOR SUMMARY 14 JUDGMENT [CCP 437C ] 15 16 Plaintiff, MSJ Date: 8/3/21 VS. Time: 9:00 am 17 Dept: S-32 vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv 18 Trial Date: 9-13-21 19 20 JAMES ANDREW MEYER et al., Hon. Judge Wilfred J. 21 Schneider, Jr. Defendants. 22 23 And Related Cross-Action 24 25 TO THIS HONORABLE COURT, Hon. Judge Wilfred J. Schneider, Jr. , 26 27 Plaintiff and counsel , Thomas S. Carter, Esq.: 28 1 Separate Statement 0f MEI for Motion for summary judgment by MEI \y \y PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Defendant, Mckeegan Enterprises, Inc., dba MEI Real Estate Services, C0rp., (hereafter “MEI”) submits its separate statement in support of its motion for summary judgment per CCP 437C et seq. as follows: \OOONONUl-PUJNp—A UNDISPUTED FACTS SUPPORTING EVIDENCE 1. MEI is a commercial real-estate brokerage. Dec. of Dillon para, 1 2. MEI placed 1MC Equipment LLC in the property for a Dec of Dillon para. 2-3 Five year lease and was paid 5% commission . 3. Plaintiff has NO documents t0 support any wrongdoing or. Request for production 1-22. tortious conduct by MEI. Special Interrogatory #5- 6 4. Plaintiff has no damages as to MEI. Special Interrogatory 19-20 Request for Admission #23 5. Plaintiff has n0 witnesses as to MEI wrongdoing as to plaintiff. Special interrogatory #21 6. Plaintiff cannot set forth any wrongdoing by MEI. Special Interrogatory 1,2,3, 15,16 NNNNNNNNNHr—‘Hb—d—lp—Ay—IHHH Form interrogatory 50.1- 50.6 Requests for admission OOVGUIAUJN—‘OCOOQO‘xUl-AWNHO 4,5,11,13,19, 22 7. Plaintiff has no contract or agreement with MEI. Form interrogatory 50. 1 - 50.6 8. MEI breached no agreement with Plaintiff. Form interrogatory 50.1-50.6 Requests for admission 4,5,11,13,19, 22 9. Plaintiff has the burden of proof. Evid. Code 115 10. Plaintiff cannot set forth cause action for fraud as t0 MEI. Request for admission #5 Request for production #4 Special interrogatory #2 2 Separate Statement of MEI for Motion for summary judgment by MEI