On June 21, 2018 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Melville James R.,
Sanchez Nadine,
and
Ahdout M.D. Doe Fifty-One Jualianne,
American Medical Systems Llc,
Azizad-Pinto Parisa M.D.,
Boston Scientific Corporation,
Boston Scientific Scimed Inc.,
Cedar-Sinai Medical Center,
Chaux George E. M.D.,
Olympus America Inc.,
Olympus Corporation Of The Americas,
Olympus Medical Systems Corp.,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/01/2019 11:51 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Gregg,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
A HORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT A HORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP
Tarifa B. Laddon (SBN 240419); Roy Manukyan (SBN 316964)
11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 750, Los Angeles, CA 90025
TELEPHONE NO.: 310.500.2090 FAX NO. (Optional): 310.500.2091
E-MAIL ADDRESS 1opuona1J: tarifa .laddon@faegrebd.com; roy. manukyan@faegrebd.com
ATTORNEY FOR /NameJ: Boston Scientific Defendants
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles
STREET ADDREss: 111 N. Hill Street
MAILINGADDREss: 111 N. Hill Street
c1TY AND z1P cooe Los Angeles, CA 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: James R. Melville, et al.
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Olympus America, Inc., et al.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): [Z] UNLIMITED CASE D LIMITED CASE BC711090
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: May 16, 2019 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 74 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
[Z] Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Michael Carroll
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. [L] This statement is submitted by party (name): Boston Scientific Defendants
b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date):
b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. D All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in [2] complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Product liability case related to allegedly defective medical device. Causes of action include: manufacturing
defect; failure to warn; design defect; negligence; and loss of consortium.
Pae1of5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California rules 3. 720-3. 730
CM-110 JRev. July 1, 2011] www.cowts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
May 01, 2019
Case Filing Date
June 21, 2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.