arrow left
arrow right
  • JAMES R MELVILLE ET AL VS OLYMPUS AMERICA INC ET AL Product Liability (not asbestos or toxic/environmental) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JAMES R MELVILLE ET AL VS OLYMPUS AMERICA INC ET AL Product Liability (not asbestos or toxic/environmental) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/01/2019 11:51 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Gregg,Deputy Clerk CM-110 A HORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT A HORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP Tarifa B. Laddon (SBN 240419); Roy Manukyan (SBN 316964) 11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 750, Los Angeles, CA 90025 TELEPHONE NO.: 310.500.2090 FAX NO. (Optional): 310.500.2091 E-MAIL ADDRESS 1opuona1J: tarifa .laddon@faegrebd.com; roy. manukyan@faegrebd.com ATTORNEY FOR /NameJ: Boston Scientific Defendants SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles STREET ADDREss: 111 N. Hill Street MAILINGADDREss: 111 N. Hill Street c1TY AND z1P cooe Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: James R. Melville, et al. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Olympus America, Inc., et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): [Z] UNLIMITED CASE D LIMITED CASE BC711090 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: May 16, 2019 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 74 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): [Z] Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Michael Carroll INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. [L] This statement is submitted by party (name): Boston Scientific Defendants b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. D All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in [2] complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Product liability case related to allegedly defective medical device. Causes of action include: manufacturing defect; failure to warn; design defect; negligence; and loss of consortium. Pae1of5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California rules 3. 720-3. 730 CM-110 JRev. July 1, 2011] www.cowts.ca.gov