arrow left
arrow right
  • KINGA TABARES VS APARTMENT RENTAL ASSISTANCE II INC ET AL Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • KINGA TABARES VS APARTMENT RENTAL ASSISTANCE II INC ET AL Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/12/2021 03:00 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Miro,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Andranik Tsarukyan (SBN 258241) Remedy Law Group LLP 610 E. Providencia Ave., Unit B Burbank, CA 91501 TELEPHONE NO.: 818.422.5941 FAX NO. (Optional): E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): andy@remedylawgroup.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff Kinga Tabares SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Kinga Tabares DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Apartment Rental Assistance II, Inc. and Marc Menowitz CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE BC711381 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: May 27, 2021 Time: 11:00 a.m. Dept.: 62 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Andy Tsarukyan INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff Kinga Tabares b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): June 25, 2018 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Employment case alleging discrimination, retaliation, sexual harassment, wrongful termination, and wage and hour claims. Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov