On June 25, 2018 a
Case Management Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Apartment Rental Assistance Ii Inc.,
Menowitz Marc,
Tabares Kinga,
and
Apartment Rental Assistance Ii Inc.,
Menowitz Marc,
Tabares Kinga,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/12/2021 03:00 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Miro,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
Andranik Tsarukyan (SBN 258241)
Remedy Law Group LLP
610 E. Providencia Ave., Unit B
Burbank, CA 91501
TELEPHONE NO.: 818.422.5941 FAX NO. (Optional):
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): andy@remedylawgroup.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff Kinga Tabares
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Kinga Tabares
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Apartment Rental Assistance II, Inc. and Marc Menowitz
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE BC711381
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: May 27, 2021 Time: 11:00 a.m. Dept.: 62 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Andy Tsarukyan
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff Kinga Tabares
b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): June 25, 2018
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Employment case alleging discrimination, retaliation, sexual harassment, wrongful termination, and wage and hour claims.
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
May 12, 2021
Case Filing Date
June 25, 2018
Category
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.