On April 12, 2018 a
No Value
was filed
involving a dispute between
Xxxxx Xxxx,
and
Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx,
Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx,
for Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Civil Division
Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 19
BC699586 August 30, 2021
xxxx xxxxx VS xxxxxx xxxxxxx ET AL 8:30 AM
Judge: Honorable Stephanie M. Bowick CSR: None
Judicial Assistant: R. Duarte ERM: None
Courtroom Assistant: C. Lam Deputy Sheriff: None
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff(s): Eitan Yehoshua (LACC)
For Defendant(s): No Appearances
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Ex Parte Application Ex Parte for Order Setting
Hearing on Application for Sale
The case is called.
The Court reads the Ex Parte Application in chambers and rules as follows:
Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application For Order Setting Hearing On Application For Sale is DENIED,
without prejudice.
The Court finds that notice was not properly given to the Judgment Debtors/Defendants Guarav
xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx xxxxxxx. (Cal. Rules of Court(CRC), rules 3.1203 and 3.1204). As the
Court has emphasized on more than one occasion (see e.g., Minute Order filed 8/12/2021), to
date, Robert J. Liskey, Esq. has not filed and served a Substitution of Attorney in this matter.
Therefore, he is not counsel of record for the Judgment Debtors/Defendants in this action.
Hence, they are currently self-represented litigants. The order granting the motion to relieve their
prior counsel was entered on July 30, 2020. Accordingly, notice of this ex parte application must
be given to the individual judgment debtors/defendants directly and not through Mr. Liskey; he
is not “Judgment Debtors’ Counsel” in this matter, as stated in the notice of ex parte application
itself. The Court will also note that the application fails to state whether the opposing parties
were intending to appear to oppose the application, as required under CRC, rule 3.1204.
Counsel for Plaintiff to give notice.
Minute Order Page 1 of 1
Document Filed Date
August 30, 2021
Case Filing Date
April 12, 2018
Category
Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Judgment on the Pleading 06/27/2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 19 BC699586 August 30, 2021 xxxx xxxxx VS xxxxxx xxxxxxx ET AL 8:30 AM Judge: Honorable Stephanie M. Bowick CSR: None Judicial Assistant: R. Duarte ERM: None Courtroom Assistant: C. Lam Deputy Sheriff: None APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff(s): Eitan Yehoshua (LACC) For Defendant(s): No Appearances NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Ex Parte Application Ex Parte for Order Setting Hearing on Application for Sale The case is called. The Court reads the Ex Parte Application in chambers and rules as follows: Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application For Order Setting Hearing On Application For Sale is DENIED, without prejudice. The Court finds that notice was not properly given to the Judgment Debtors/Defendants Guarav xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx xxxxxxx. (Cal. Rules of Court(CRC), rules 3.1203 and 3.1204). As the Court has emphasized on more than one occasion (see e.g., Minute Order filed 8/12/2021), to date, Robert J. Liskey, Esq. has not filed and served a Substitution of Attorney in this matter. Therefore, he is not counsel of record for the Judgment Debtors/Defendants in this action. Hence, they are currently self-represented litigants. The order granting the motion to relieve their prior counsel was entered on July 30, 2020. Accordingly, notice of this ex parte application must be given to the individual judgment debtors/defendants directly and not through Mr. Liskey; he is not “Judgment Debtors’ Counsel” in this matter, as stated in the notice of ex parte application itself. The Court will also note that the application fails to state whether the opposing parties were intending to appear to oppose the application, as required under CRC, rule 3.1204. Counsel for Plaintiff to give notice. Minute Order Page 1 of 1