Judgment: xxxx xxxxx VS xxxxxx xxxxxxx ET AL

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/22/2022 03:47 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Lara,Deputy Clerk




                     Robert J. Liskey, Bar # 197287
             1
                     The Liskey Law Firm
             2       117 East Colorado Blvd., #600
                     Pasadena, CA 91105
             3       Telephone (626) 319-5817
             4       Facsimile (626) 628-3019
                     robliskey@liskeylawfirm.com
             5
                     Attorneys for judgment debtors, xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
             6
                     and xxxxxx xxxxxxx
             7
             8                                 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
             9                                                FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
           10
                     xxxx xxxxx,                                                                       CASE NO.: BC699586
           11
           12                                           Plaintiff,                                     [Hon. Stephanie M. Bowick]

           13        vs.                                                                               OBJECTIONS TO DECLARATIONS OF
           14                                                                                          xxxx xxxxx AND EITAN YEHOSHUA
                     xxxxxx xxxxxxx; xxxxxx                                                            AND EXHIIBITS SUBMITTED IN
           15        SRIVISTAVA; and DOES 1 to 20, inclusive,                                          SUPPORT OF JUDGMENT CREDITOR’S
                                                                                                       APPLICATION FOR SALE OF DWELLING
           16
                                                        Defendants.                                    AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
           17                                                                                          ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING
                                                                                                       SHOULD NOT BE MADE
           18
           19                                                                                          [CLAIM OF EXEMPTION; OPPOSITION
                                                                                                       TO APPLICATION; MEMORANDUM OF
           20                                                                                          POINTS AND AUTHORITIES AND
                                                                                                       DECLARATIONS IN OPPOSITION FILED
           21                                                                                          CONCURRENTLY]
           22
                                                                                                       Date: March 7, 2022
           23                                                                                          Time: 8:30 a.m.
           24                                                                                          Dept: 19

           25                                                                                          Complaint Filed: April 12, 2018
           26
           27
                                 Judgment Debtors xxxxxx xxxxxxx and xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx submit the following
           28        objections to the purported evidence presented in support of Judgment Creditor xxxx xxxxx’s
                                                                                                 -1-
                                       OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED IN SUPPOR OF APPLICATION FOR SALE