arrow left
arrow right
  • MERCHANT CASH AND CAPITAL LLC VS FERLO CORP ET AL Negligent Breach of Contract/Warranty (no fraud) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MERCHANT CASH AND CAPITAL LLC VS FERLO CORP ET AL Negligent Breach of Contract/Warranty (no fraud) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Superior Court of California JUN 20 2019 Sherr’ ve Officer/Clerk of Court County of Los Angeles By. , Deputy Department 51 MERCHANT CASH AND CAPITAL, LLC, Case No.: BC701037 Plaintiff, Hearing Date: 6/20/19 v. Trial Date: N/A FERLO CORP., et al., RULING RE: Defendants. Motion to Amend Judgment to add Ferchu Corporation as an Additional Judgment Debtor, Successor of Judgment Debtor Ferlo Corp. under CCP § 187 Background On July 12, 2018, Default Judgment (“Judgment”) was entered against Defendant Ferlo Corp. (“Ferlo”) for damages based on allegations that Ferlo violated the terms of receivables purchase agreement. Judgment was entered in the principal amount of $51,061.45 plus interest, costs, and attorneys’ fees for a total judgment of $57,920.47 in favor of Plaintiff Merchant Cash and Capital, LLC (“Bizfi”). On March 22, 2019, Bizfi filed the instant motion to amend the said Judgment to add Ferchu Corporation (“Ferchu”) as an additional judgment debtor and successor of judgment debtor Ferlo under Code Civ. Proc. §187. No Opposition was filed. The Court considered the moving papers and rules as follows. Motion to Amend Judgment Standard Pursuant to CCP § 187, a trial court has jurisdiction to modify a judgment to add additional judgment debtors. Section 187 grants to every court the power to use all means to carry its jurisdiction into effect, even if those processes are not set out in the code. CCP § 187. A successor company can be added as judgment debtor to a default judgment on a “successor corporation” theory. Wolf Metals Inc. v. Rand Pac. Sales. Inc. (2016) 4 Cal.App.5th 698, 703. According to that theory, when a corporation sells or transfers all of its assets to another 9 the latter is also liable for the former's debts corporation constituting its “ ‘mere continuation, and liabilities. Id. Generally, “ ‘California decisions holding that a corporation acquiring the assets of another corporation is the latter's mere continuation and therefore liable for its debts have imposed such liability only upon a showing of one or both of the following factual 1