arrow left
arrow right
  • MERCHANT CASH AND CAPITAL LLC VS FERLO CORP ET AL Negligent Breach of Contract/Warranty (no fraud) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MERCHANT CASH AND CAPITAL LLC VS FERLO CORP ET AL Negligent Breach of Contract/Warranty (no fraud) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

JUD-100 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, state bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Lauren Hanley-Brady (SBN 299644) CA - Global Legal Resources Global Legal Law Firm, 380 Stevens Ave., Ste. 311 Solana Beach CA 92075 TELEPHONE NO.: 888-846-8901 FAX NO. (Optional): 888-846-8902 lbrady@attorneygl.com E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Bizfi SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse PLAINTIFF: Merchant Cash and Capital LLC DEFENDANT: Ferlo Corp., et al. CASE NUMBER: AMENDED JUDGMENT D By Clerk D By Default D After Court Trial BC701037 D By Court D On Stipulation D Defendant Did Not Appear at Trial JUDGMENT 1. D  BY DEFAULT a. Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint. b. Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend the action within the time allowed by law. c. Defendant's default was entered by the clerk upon plaintiff's application. d. D Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(a)). Defendant was sued only on a contract or judgment of a court of this state for the recovery of money. e. D Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(b)). The court considered (1) D plaintiff's testimony and other evidence. (2) D plaintiff's written declaration (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(d)). 2. D ON STIPULATION a. Plaintiff and defendant agreed (stipulated) that a judgment be entered in this case. The court approved the stipulated judgment and b. D the signed written stipulation was filed in the case. c. D the stipulation was stated in open court D the stipulation was stated on the record. 3. D AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence. a. The case was tried on (date and time): before (name of judicial officer): b. Appearances by: D Plaintiff (name each): D Plaintiff's attorney (name each): (1) (1) (2) (2) D Continued on Attachment 3b. D Defendant (name each): D Defendant 's attorney (name each): (1) (1) (2) (2) D Continued on Attachment 3b. c. D Defendant did not appear at trial. Defendant was properly served with notice of trial. d. D A statement of decision (Code Civ. Proc., § 632) D was not D was requested. Page 1 of 2 Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California JUDGMENT Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 585, 664.6 JUD-100 [New January 1, 2002]