On May 04, 2018 a
RESPONDENT'S BRIEF
was filed
involving a dispute between
Lopez Lucy,
and
Gutherie Douglas,
Housing Authority Of The City Of Los,
for Writ - Administrative Mandamus (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
OO Oe BO
Law Office of Joseph L. Stark & Assoc. APC
25129 The Old Road
Suite 208
Stevenson Ranch, CA 91381 Sy rior FIL!
IT: (661) 799-1880 ‘Ounty of Los of1 Calitomia
geles
F: (661) 799-1881
els
Joseph L. Stark - State Bar No. 116261 SEP 24 2018
jls@legalkix.com Shi ‘xecutive Officer/Clerk
By.
»Puty
Attorneys For: Respondent, HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES?
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CENTRAL DISTRICT STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE
10
11 LUCY LOPEZ Case Number: BS173529
12 Petitioner, Exempt from Fees Pursuant to
Government Code Section 6103
13
RESPONDENT'S BRIEF
14
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF LOS)
15 ANGELES, and DOUGLAS GUTHRIE, in His)
Official Capacity as President and Chief)
16 Executive Officer of the Housing Authority of)
the City of Los Angeles, and DOES 1 through 10,)
17 s
Respondent. )
18
19 INTRODUCTION
20 Petitioner makes the superficially compelling argument that the decision of the Housing
21 Authority which was thereafter affirmed by an independent hearing officer, is dependent upon
22 asingle document” and that Petitioner provided “evidence” contradicting the assertions of the
23 lagency. However, since neither of the primary assertions of the Petitioner is accurate, the
24 superficial appeal of these points quickly fades.
oS 25 The “single document” theory would be fine but for the fact that the “single document
ee
~
Pet 26 was supplied, under penalty of perjury, by the very individual who was residing at the Petitioner’s
tm
Law Office of *
Joseph L Su 27 unit, without authorization, establishing that he lived there. One is sometimes all that is needed
3Si35 The Old Road
Suite 208 |The contrary “evidence” to which Petitioner points is probative not of the facts asserted by
Stevenson Ranch CA 94
(661) 799-188
1
RESPONDENT'S BRIEF
Document Filed Date
September 24, 2018
Case Filing Date
May 04, 2018
Category
Writ - Administrative Mandamus (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Court Finding - After Court Trial 11/26/2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
OO Oe BO Law Office of Joseph L. Stark & Assoc. APC 25129 The Old Road Suite 208 Stevenson Ranch, CA 91381 Sy rior FIL! IT: (661) 799-1880 ‘Ounty of Los of1 Calitomia geles F: (661) 799-1881 els Joseph L. Stark - State Bar No. 116261 SEP 24 2018 jls@legalkix.com Shi ‘xecutive Officer/Clerk By. »Puty Attorneys For: Respondent, HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES? SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL DISTRICT STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE 10 11 LUCY LOPEZ Case Number: BS173529 12 Petitioner, Exempt from Fees Pursuant to Government Code Section 6103 13 RESPONDENT'S BRIEF 14 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF LOS) 15 ANGELES, and DOUGLAS GUTHRIE, in His) Official Capacity as President and Chief) 16 Executive Officer of the Housing Authority of) the City of Los Angeles, and DOES 1 through 10,) 17 s Respondent. ) 18 19 INTRODUCTION 20 Petitioner makes the superficially compelling argument that the decision of the Housing 21 Authority which was thereafter affirmed by an independent hearing officer, is dependent upon 22 asingle document” and that Petitioner provided “evidence” contradicting the assertions of the 23 lagency. However, since neither of the primary assertions of the Petitioner is accurate, the 24 superficial appeal of these points quickly fades. oS 25 The “single document” theory would be fine but for the fact that the “single document ee ~ Pet 26 was supplied, under penalty of perjury, by the very individual who was residing at the Petitioner’s tm Law Office of * Joseph L Su 27 unit, without authorization, establishing that he lived there. One is sometimes all that is needed 3Si35 The Old Road Suite 208 |The contrary “evidence” to which Petitioner points is probative not of the facts asserted by Stevenson Ranch CA 94 (661) 799-188 1 RESPONDENT'S BRIEF