On May 07, 2018 a
PLAINTIFF MIGUEL ANGEL RUIZ'S COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES FOR: (1) DISCRIMINATION HARASSMENT, AND RETALIATION ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY, FAILURE TO ACCOMMODATE DISABILITY, FAILURE TO ENGAGE IN THE INTERACT
was filed
involving a dispute between
Ruiz Miguel Angel,
and
Caraustar Custom Packaging Group Inc.,
Caraustar Industrial And Consumer Products,
Caraustar Industrial And Consumer Products Group Inc.,
Caraustar Recovered Fiber Group Inc,
Harper Laverk,
Los Angeles Paper Box,
Medina Carlos,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Carney R. Sh
CShegerian@ e}
Anthony N en,
eC;
Sheria Esin, anlaw.com
Esq., State Bar No. 150461
S: FIL
ANguyen @sh
e} gerianiaw.col
., State Bar No. 259154
Gloria Tumanyan, Esq., State Bar No. 304028
for Court of
Ounty of Los Annéles
GTuman Shegeri: aw.com MAY 07 2018
SHEGE) & ASSOCIATES, INC. ‘ RG;
225 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 700 By. Wve OfficertClerk
Santa Monica, California
Telephone Number: 310 860-0770 len Deputy
Facsimile Number: 310 860-0771
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
MIG IL ANGEL RUIZ
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT ,
11
BC705 22:8
12 MIGUEL ANGEL RUIZ, Case No.:
13 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF MIGUEL ANGEL RUIZ’S
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES FOR:
14 vs.
qd DISC RIMINATION, HARASSMENT,
15 CARAUSTAR CUSTOM RETALIATIO) N ON THE
PACKAGING GROUP, INC., BASIS OF DISABILITY, FAILURE
16 CARAUSTAR INDUS’ T RIAL AND TO ACCOMMODATE DISABILITY,
CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LOS FAILURE TO ENGAGE IN THE
17 ANGELES PAPER BOX. INTERACTIVE PROCESS IN
CARAUSTER INDUSTRIES, INC. VIOLATION OF FHEA;
18 CARAUSTER CORP., CROCKETT VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA
GRAPHICS, INC., CARAUSTAR FAMILY RIGHTS ACT; FAILURE
19 INDUSTRIAL AND CONSUMER TO PREVENT DISCRIMINATION,
PRODUCTS GROUP, INC., HARASSMENT, AND
20 LABERK HARPER, é ‘ARLOS RETALIATION;
MEDINA, and DOES 1 to 100,
21 inclusive, (2) BREACH OF EXPRESS ORAL
CONTRACT NOT TO TERMINATE
22 Defendants. EMPLOYMENT WITHOUT GOOD
CAUSE;
a3
oe
(3) BREACH OF IMPLIED-IN-FACT
a4
a
CONTRACT NOT TO TERMINATE
EMPLOYMENT WITHOUT GOOD
nas CAUSE;
oh (4) NEGLIGENT HIRIN G.
SUPERVISION, AND RETENTION;
27
(5) WRONGFUL TERMINATION OF
28 EMPLOYMENT IN VIOLATION OF
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
Document Filed Date
May 07, 2018
Case Filing Date
May 07, 2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Carney R. Sh CShegerian@ e} Anthony N en, eC; Sheria Esin, anlaw.com Esq., State Bar No. 150461 S: FIL ANguyen @sh e} gerianiaw.col ., State Bar No. 259154 Gloria Tumanyan, Esq., State Bar No. 304028 for Court of Ounty of Los Annéles GTuman Shegeri: aw.com MAY 07 2018 SHEGE) & ASSOCIATES, INC. ‘ RG; 225 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 700 By. Wve OfficertClerk Santa Monica, California Telephone Number: 310 860-0770 len Deputy Facsimile Number: 310 860-0771 Attorneys for Plaintiff, MIG IL ANGEL RUIZ SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT , 11 BC705 22:8 12 MIGUEL ANGEL RUIZ, Case No.: 13 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF MIGUEL ANGEL RUIZ’S COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES FOR: 14 vs. qd DISC RIMINATION, HARASSMENT, 15 CARAUSTAR CUSTOM RETALIATIO) N ON THE PACKAGING GROUP, INC., BASIS OF DISABILITY, FAILURE 16 CARAUSTAR INDUS’ T RIAL AND TO ACCOMMODATE DISABILITY, CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LOS FAILURE TO ENGAGE IN THE 17 ANGELES PAPER BOX. INTERACTIVE PROCESS IN CARAUSTER INDUSTRIES, INC. VIOLATION OF FHEA; 18 CARAUSTER CORP., CROCKETT VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA GRAPHICS, INC., CARAUSTAR FAMILY RIGHTS ACT; FAILURE 19 INDUSTRIAL AND CONSUMER TO PREVENT DISCRIMINATION, PRODUCTS GROUP, INC., HARASSMENT, AND 20 LABERK HARPER, é ‘ARLOS RETALIATION; MEDINA, and DOES 1 to 100, 21 inclusive, (2) BREACH OF EXPRESS ORAL CONTRACT NOT TO TERMINATE 22 Defendants. EMPLOYMENT WITHOUT GOOD CAUSE; a3 oe (3) BREACH OF IMPLIED-IN-FACT a4 a CONTRACT NOT TO TERMINATE EMPLOYMENT WITHOUT GOOD nas CAUSE; oh (4) NEGLIGENT HIRIN G. SUPERVISION, AND RETENTION; 27 (5) WRONGFUL TERMINATION OF 28 EMPLOYMENT IN VIOLATION OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES