Proof of Service: JANE DOE VS MOHAMMED RASEKHI ET AL

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                /‘1:




1 Kent T. Brandmeyer, Esq. (SBN 140533)
  Jearmette L. Van Horst, Esq. (SBN 169249)
2 LAW + BRANDMEYER, LLP                                                              .                   .     .
     2 North Lake Avenue, Suite 820                                           su8g3:iyCociuI:i)§fA?1?;2aigrsr"a
3    Pasadena, CA 91101                                                                              ‘
     (626)243-5500 Telephone                                                    / Aug 13 2018
 4 (626) 243-4799 Facsimile
                                                                         Sherri B. Carter, Exec ' Qtcer/C|en< of Court
 5   Attorneys for Defendants,                                            By         _ —;:-=           '     Deputy
   MOHAMMED RASEKHI, M.D. and                                                      'Soré'vé' omero
 6 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MEDICAL CENTER, INC.

 7

 8

 9                              SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

10                     FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES — NORTHWEST DISTRICT

11
     JANE DOE, an individual,                                 ) CASE NO. BC 696815
12                                                            ) [Assigned for all purposes In (ht
                         Plaintiff,                           )       Hon. John Kralik; Dept. "I“]
13                                                            )
               V.                                             )                                                          I’
14                                                            ) PROOF OF SERVICE RE COl'RT     .
   MOHAMMED RASEKHI, an individual;                           ) MINUTES ENTERED 7f3l/I8 RE ORDER
15 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MEDICAL                                ) PURSUANT TO PERI-ZSIIVTORY       5
     CENTER, INC., a California nonprot                       ) CHALLENGE                                                     1
16   corporation; and DOES l-100 Inclusive,                   )                                                                1          q
                                                              )                                                                " .. - ’
17                                                            )                                                                    ’‘
                         Defendants.                          )                                                                      ‘
18                                                            )
                                                              )
19                                                            ) Complaint led: 03/02/2018
                                                              ) Trial Date: None
20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     \\db004\prolawlive\documcnts\109-0449\l 58887.doc            1
       " “’”"""""P                                            sUANT TO
                                                     PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE