arrow left
arrow right
  • NEW LINE MARKETING INC VS REBECCA ALDABERT Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • NEW LINE MARKETING INC VS REBECCA ALDABERT Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/04/2019 03:35 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by P. Offord,Deputy Clerk 1 FEIG Law Firm Scott Feig, Esq. (SBN 299493) 2 780 Roosevelt Suite 220 Irvine, California 92620 3 Telephone: (949) 689-9715 Facsimile: (949) 681-5125 4 Evan Côté (SBN 293365) 5 Coast Litigation 300 Spectrum Ctr. Dr, Suite 400 6 Irvine, CA 92618 7 (949) 769-2285 evan@coastlitigation.com 8 Attorney for Defendant, REBECCA ALDABERT 9 10 11 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 12 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 13 ) Case No. BC696378 ) 14 ) Opposition to Motion to Compel NEW LINE MARKETING, INC., a ) Further Responses to Requests for the 15 California corporation ) Production of Documents, Set One ) 16 Plaintiff ) ) 17 v. ) Date: March 18, 2019 ) Time: 8:30 a.m. 18 ) Dept.: 62 REBECCA ALDABERT, Defendant, ) ) 19 ) ) 20 ) ) 21 ) ) 22 23 To the Court and all parties and their attorneys of record: 24 Defendant submits her Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Responses. 25 Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Responses should be denied because: 26 1. Plaintiff has given improper notice; 27 28 Page 1 of 6 Pages OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL