arrow left
arrow right
  • PRISCILLA CLARKE VS LEWIS WILKINS Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (Limited Jurisdiction) document preview
  • PRISCILLA CLARKE VS LEWIS WILKINS Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (Limited Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILEQ by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/28/2019 04:42 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Gomez, Deputy Clerk Steve Lopez (SBN 224540) LAW OFFICE OF STEVE LOPEZ 8562 Florence Ave. Downey, CA 90240 Tel: ($62) 904-1193 Fax: (562) 262-2846 E-mail: steve@stevelopezlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff, Priscilla Clarke SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES : CENTRAL DISTRICT- STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE 1 10 PRISCILLA CLARKE, an Individual CASE NO.: 18STLC09925 i Plaintiff, DECLARATION OF STEVE LOPEZ IN 12 SUPPORT OF MOTION TO AMEND Vv. j COMPLAINT 13 2 Code Civ. Proc. § 473(a)(1); Code Civ. Proc. 14 LEWIS WILKINS, an Individual, and DOES 1 § 576; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1324 through 10, 15 Defendants. Hearing date: 9/3/19 16 ime: 8:30 AM Dept. No.: 94 17 Reservation No.: 908526355752. 18 19 20 21 I, Steve Lapez, declare as follows: 22 1. Tam an attorney duly licensed to practice law before all courts of the State of California. My 23 law firm, Law Office of Steve Lopez, is counsel for Plaintiff Priscilla Clarke (“Plaintiff”) in this action. 24 This declaration is submitted in support of Plaintiff's Motion To Amend Complaint, filed on July 24, 25 2018, in the following respects: said Complaint fails to mention an agreement between Plaintiff and 26 Phillip Clarke (“Phillip”), Plaintiff's husband and which Phillip assigned for the rights under the Loan to} 27 plaintiff Clark. The following facts are within my personal knowledge and, if called as a witness herein, 28 I can and will competently testify thereto. -1- DECLARATION OF STEVE LOPEZ IN SUI IPPORT OF MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT _ [Code Civ. Proc. § 473(a)(1); Code Civ. Proc. § 576; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1324] i