arrow left
arrow right
  • PHUONG T. NGUYEN VS. LONDON BREED ET AL FRAUD document preview
  • PHUONG T. NGUYEN VS. LONDON BREED ET AL FRAUD document preview
  • PHUONG T. NGUYEN VS. LONDON BREED ET AL FRAUD document preview
  • PHUONG T. NGUYEN VS. LONDON BREED ET AL FRAUD document preview
  • PHUONG T. NGUYEN VS. LONDON BREED ET AL FRAUD document preview
  • PHUONG T. NGUYEN VS. LONDON BREED ET AL FRAUD document preview
  • PHUONG T. NGUYEN VS. LONDON BREED ET AL FRAUD document preview
  • PHUONG T. NGUYEN VS. LONDON BREED ET AL FRAUD document preview
						
                                

Preview

Change Document Font | Size Check Spelling Email Form Save Form CIV-141 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY: STATE BAR NO: FOR COURT USE ONLY NAME: David Chiu (SB# 189542) / Meredith B. Osborn (SB# 250467) + FIRM NAME: Natassia Kwan (SB# 294322) / Office of the City Attorney STREET ADDRESS: 1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor CITY: San Francisco STATE: CA ZIP CODE: 94102 ELECTRONICALLY TELEPHONE NO.: (415) 554-4272 FAX NO.: (415) 554-3837 FILED E-MAIL ADDRESS: natassia.kwan@sfcityatty.org Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendant City and County of San Francisco SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 06/02/2023 STREET ADDRESS: 400 McAllister Street Clerk of the Court MAILING ADDRESS: BY: WILLIAM TRUPEK Deputy Clerk San Francisco 94102 CITY AND ZIP CODE: Civic Center Courthouse BRANCH NAME: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: PHUONG T. NGUYEN DEFENDANT/REPSONDENT: CITY&CNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED Paul Miyamoto, Tina Tam, Corey Teague, Jennifer Choi, Michael Borovina Jr. , SFPUC CASE NUMBER: + DECLARATION OF DEMURRING OR MOVING PARTY CGC-21-591803 IN SUPPORT OF AUTOMATIC EXTENSION 1. (Name of party): Defendant City and County of San Francisco was served with  a complaint  an amended complaint  a cross-complaint  an answer  other (specify): in the above-titled action. 2. For a demurrer or motion to strike, a responsive pleading is due on (date): June 2, 2023 DECLARATION I intend to file a demurrer, motion to strike, or motion for judgment on the pleadings in this action. Before I can do so, I am required to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading that I am responding to at least five days before the date when the responsive pleading is due (if I am filing a demurrer or motion to strike) and at least five days before the last day a motion for judgment on the pleadings may be filed (if I am filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings). We have not been able to meet and confer. I have not previously requested an automatic extension of time. Therefore, on timely filing and serving a declaration that meets the requirements of Code of Civil Procedure sections 430.41, 435.5, or 439, I am entitled to an automatic 30-day extension of time within which to file a + responsive pleading or motion for judgment on the pleadings. I made a good faith attempt to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading at least five days before the date the responsive pleading was due (if I am filing a demurrer or motion to strike) and at least five days before the last day a motion for judgment on the pleadings may be filed (if I am filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings). I was unable to meet with that party because (the reasons why the parties could not meet and confer are stated):  below  on form MC-031, Attached Declaration On May 19, 2023, I sent an email to Plaintiff Phuong Nguyen's email address regarding the City's intention to file a demurrer to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. A true and correct copy of that email is attached as Exhibit A. In that email, I asked if Plaintiff was available to discuss by telephone the issues in her Second Amended Complaint. I also tried to call Plaintiff Nguyen in early May 2023, the call was unanswered and Plaintiff's voicemail box was full. In my email, I proposed a date to meet and confer with Plaintiff before the responsive pleading deadline, but have not heard from Plaintiff so the parties have not been able to speak by telephone nor reach an agreement about those issues. Because the City Defendants have not met the requirements under Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41 to meet and confer with Plaintiff despite City Defendants' counsel's efforts, the City Defendants submit this Declaration for an automatic 30-day extension from June 2, 2023 to file their responsive pleading, so that the parties may attempt to confer about + the Second Amended Complaint. The new deadline for the City Defendants' responsive pleading is July 3, 2023. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information above is true and correct. Date: June 2, 2023 Natassia Kwan (NAME OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY FOR PARTY) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY FOR PARTY) Page 1 of 1 Form Approved for Optional Use DECLARATION OF DEMURRING OR MOVING PARTY Code of Civil Procedure, Judicial Council of California §§ 430.41, 435.5, 439 CIV-141 [Rev. January 1, 2019] IN SUPPORT OF AUTOMATIC EXTENSION www.courts.ca.gov Print this Form EXHIBIT A From: Kwan, Natassia (CAT) To: "Faith Nguyen" Cc: Trejo, Monica (CAT) Subject: Nguyen lawsuit- meet & confer re: demurrer to Second Amended Complaint Date: Friday, May 19, 2023 3:59:32 PM Dear Faith, Hope you are well. Do you have time Wednesday, May 24 in the morning to meet and confer regarding the Defendants’ demurrer to the Second Amended Complaint? Regarding the 14th cause of action. Please let me know your availability and best number to reach you. Many thanks, Natassia Natassia Kwan (she/her) Deputy City Attorney Office of City Attorney David Chiu (415) 554-4272 Direct www.sfcityattorney.org 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 I, KATHLEEN K. HILL, declare as follows: 3 I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the above- entitled action. I am employed at the City Attorney’s Office of San Francisco, Fox Plaza Building, 4 1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102. 5 On June 2, 2023, I served the following document(s): 6 DECLARATION OF DEMURRING OR MOVING PARTY IN SUPPORT OF AUTOMATIC EXTENSION 7 on the following persons at the locations specified: 8 Phuong T. Nguyen Scott A. Freedman P.O. Box 585 Laura F. Strazzo 9 Brisbane, CA 94005 Zacks & Freedman, PC 601 Montgomery Street, Suite 400 10 Telephone: (650) 228-6880 San Francisco, CA 94111 Email: drfaith37@gmail.com Telephone: (415) 956-8100 11 Facsimile: (415) 288-9755 Plaintiff in Pro Per Email: scott@zfplaw.com 12 (by U.S. Mail and Email) James B. Kraus 13 816 Alvarado Street San Francisco, CA 94114 14 Telephone: (415) 606-8535 Email: jbkrausesq@aol.com 15 Attorneys for Defendant Ryan James Patterson 16 (by Email Only) 17 in the manner indicated below: 18 BY UNITED STATES MAIL: Following ordinary business practices, I caused to be sealed true and correct copies of the above documents in addressed envelope(s) and had them placed at my workplace for 19 collection and mailing with the United States Postal Service. I am readily familiar with the practices of the San Francisco City Attorney's Office for collecting and processing mail. In the ordinary course of business, the sealed 20 envelope(s) that were placed for collection would be deposited, postage prepaid, with the United States Postal Service that same day. 21 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL: I caused a copy of such document to be transmitted via electronic mail in 22 portable document format (“PDF”) Adobe Acrobat from the electronic address: kathleen.hill@sfcityatty.org. 23 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL: Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties to accept electronic service, I caused the documents to be served electronically through File & ServeXpress in portable document 24 format ("PDF") Adobe Acrobat. 25 I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 2, 2023. 26 27 KATHLEEN K. HILL 28 4 Declaration of Demurring Party re Extension - Case No. CGC-21-591803 n:\lit\li2023\210916\01681338.docx