Order: GREGORY DAVENPORT VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Super;      ILE
                                                                                                    Ounty,       ere    OF
                                                                                                                       98 Ap}
                                                                                         Shem g c    AN 29

                                                                                                          lke,
                                                                                                Osos Li                         ery, ‘k
                                                                                                      Cha     ay
                                                                                                                                  Pury
                         SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                    FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT


      GREGORY DAVENPORT.                                            CASE NO.:   BC718192

                      Plaintiff.                                   -fFENFATIVE] ORDER RE:
                                                                    DEMURRER;      MOTION TO STRIKE
              VS.
                                                                    8:30 a.m.
      COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,              et al                     January 28, 2019
10                                                                  Dept. 56

Il
                      Defendants.

12
              Plaintiff filed this employment action on August 15, 2018, alleging causes of action for (1
13
      FEHA sex discrimination,      (2) FEHA harassment,      (3) FEHA retaliation,    (4) intentional inflictioi
14
      of emotional distress, (5) FEHA disability discrimination,         (6) FEHA failure to accommodate,                 (7
15:
      FEHA    failure to engage in the interactive process,        (8) failure to pay minimum wages,         (9) non+
16
      compliant wage statements and failure to maintain accurate payroll records,           and (10) wages not,
17
      timely paid upon termination.
18

19
      Demurrer
20
              Defendant County of Los Aneles demurs to all causes of action other than the fourth cause
21
      of action which is not asserted against it. Defendant demurs on the ground that the Complaint fail:
22
      to’state sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action.
23

24

25




                                                          -1-