Document for DANFIELD, INC., A CORPORATION VS PH DESIGN, INC., A CORPORATION, ET AL.

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                To prevent others from viewing what you have entered on your form, please
                                press the Clear This Form button at the end of this form when finished.


                                                                                                               Reserved for Clerk's File Stamp
                   SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
                      COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES                                                                             FILED
                                                                                                               Superior Court of California
Sfakley Mosk Courthouse - 111 North Hill, Los Angeles, CA 90012                                                   Countyof Los Angeles
PLAINTIFF:
                                                                                                                     04/06/2021
Danfield,        Inc.,    a Corporation                                                                  [Seri R. Carter, ExecutiveO cer}
                                                                                                                                       2 Cemaf Cow
DEFENDANT:                                                                                                 By:             M. Nguyen      Deputy
PH    Design,       Inc., a Corporation
                                                                                                          CASE NUMBER:
                             ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING                                                  18STSC08307

 To party/ attorney of record:        Danfield, Inc., a Corporation


 You are ordered to appear for an Order to Show Cause Hearing on:


             Date: 5/10/21    Time: 8:30 AM   Dept: 1A                Address: AS ABOVE

 and show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for:

       Failure to file:

       Oo    Proof of Service of [] Petition (] Summons and [] Complaint             [] Cross-Complaint pursuant to California Rules
             of Court, rule 3.110(b) and (c) as to:

             Request for Entry of Default pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.110(g) as to:

             Request for Entry of Default Judgment pursuant to California Rules of Court:
                 CH rule 3.110(h)                 Crule 3.740(f)          as to:

              Request to Set Case for Trial-Unlawful Detainer.

             Case Management Statement pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 3.720-3.730.

             Request for Dismissal
                   (as to remaining defendants
                   (as to cross-complaint
                   C1 pursuant to settlement agreement
                   DJ other

       Oo    Judgment pursuant to court order.

       Oo    (Other)

       Failure to appear as ordered on                                                    Oi regarding


       Failure to file any and all papers/documents necessary to bring the matter to trial or effect a final disposition as to all
       issues and parties to the action.

       (Other)     PURSUANT TO STANDING ORDER 2020-SJ-001-00




     LACIV 166 (Rev. 09/13)                       ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING                                                       Page 1 of 2
     LASC Approved 06-04                                                                                            LASC Local Rules, Chapter 3
     For Optional Use                                                                                               Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2.30