On July 09, 2018 a
No Value
was filed
involving a dispute between
Neman Brothers & Assoc. Inc.,
and
Apparel Castle Hill,
B. Chetta,
Castle Hill Apparel Inc.,
. Darian,
Darian Group Inc.,
Dark After,
D.G.I,
Evening Chetta B.,
Fay Leslie,
Hill Castle,
Jennings Darian,
K-Studio,
La Nicole Miller,
Leigh Madison,
Miller Nicole,
Nmny Group Llc,
Ny Nicole Miller,
Recco Gerard,
Recco Jerry,
R&K Evenings,
Rodbell Gary,
Schlossberg Andrea Gail,
Schlossberg Darian Beth,
Schlossberg Martin,
Stevens Karin,
Suits Isabella,
Thyme Another,
Thyme Just In,
for Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
AT-120
ATTORNEY OR PART? WiTHOUTATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Nico N. Tabibi, Esq, (#169036)
| LAW OFFICES OF NICO N. TABIBI, APC
9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Penthouse, Beverly Hills, CA 90212
TELEPHONE NO:(310) 276-1555 FAX NO, (Optionay: (310) 273-1606
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional):
ATTORNEY FOR (Name)DI aintiff
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
‘STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street F
mauincaooress; 111 N. Hill Street E
cry anozpcove:
BRANCH NAME:
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Central District, Unlimited Jurisdiction
“8 erlor Court of California
‘ounty of Los Angeles
PLAINTIFF: NEMAN BROTHERS & ASSOCS., INC., etc. AUG 31 2018
DEFENDANT: DARIAN GROUP, INC., etc., et al. $I es PR tive Officer/Clerk
CASE NUMBERS hy
(J RIGHT To ATTACH ORDER AND ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF Michael Rivera
ATTACHMENT AFTER HEARING BC713236
(1) orDER FOR ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL WRIT OF ATTACHMENT AFTER
HEARING
1. a. The application of plaintiff (name): NEMAN BROTHERS & ASSOC., INC., a California corporation
for a right to attach order and order for issuance of writ of attachment
(Can order for issuance of additional writ of attachment
against the property of defendant (n; ; NMNY GROUP, LLC a New York limited liability company, dba
came on for hearing as follows: NICOLE MILLER, dba NICOLE MILLER NY, dba NICOLE MILLER LA
(1) Judge (name): Honorable >
(2) Hearing date: August 31, 2018 “rime: 9: RCHEDL BRC! KLOFF, Judge (Crm:
%
b. The following persons were present at the hearing:
(1) ) Plaintiff (name): (3) Plaintiffs attorney (name): NICD N- Tabibi
(2)[_] Defendant (name): (4) Defendant's attorney (name): May N. Wellman
FINDINGS
2. THE COURT FINDS. NMNY GROUP, LLC a New York limited liability
a. Defendant (specify name): company, dba NICOLE MILLER, dba NICOLE
MILLER NY, dba NICOLE MILLER LA isa [) natural person oO partnership
(J unincorporated association ([) comoration [¥_] other (specify): a New York limited liability company
b. The claim upon which the application is based is one upon which an attachment may be issued.
c. Plaintiff has established the probable validity of the claim upon which the attachment is based.
d. The attachment is not sought for a purpose other than the recovery on the claim upon which the attachment is based.
e. The amount to be secured by the attachment is greater than zero.
f. Wd Defendant failed to prove that all the property described in plaintiffs application is exempt from attachment.
g. LZ] The following property of defendant, described in plaintiffs application
€)
Mc xt empt from attachment (specify):
(2) lot exempt from attachment (specify):
h. [] The following property, not described in plaintiff's application, claimed by defendant to be exempt,
(1) [1] is exempt from attachment (specify):
(2) [1] is not exempt from attachment (specify): *
i. (2) An undertaking in the amount of $ 10,000.00 is required before a writ shall issue, and plaintiff
TW has CT) has not filed an undertaking in that amou
J. A Right to Attach Order was issued on (date): pAutust 34-2048 pursuant to
[1] Code of Civil Procedure section 484.090 (on hearing) Co Ode of Civil Procedure section 485.220 (ex parte)
k. [J other (specify):
oes
Wet
Page 1of2
ner Form proved for tional Use RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER AFTER HEARING AND ORDER Code of Civil Proc., §§ 482.030, 484.080;
ai Jui ‘Coundof Cali ia ‘Welfare & Institutions Code, § 15657.01
‘AT-120 (Rev. July 1, 2010], FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF ATTACHMENT (Attachment) ‘www couiinfo.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
August 31, 2018
Case Filing Date
July 09, 2018
Category
Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Before Trial - Lack of Prosecution 02/21/2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
AT-120 ATTORNEY OR PART? WiTHOUTATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Nico N. Tabibi, Esq, (#169036) | LAW OFFICES OF NICO N. TABIBI, APC 9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Penthouse, Beverly Hills, CA 90212 TELEPHONE NO:(310) 276-1555 FAX NO, (Optionay: (310) 273-1606 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name)DI aintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ‘STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street F mauincaooress; 111 N. Hill Street E cry anozpcove: BRANCH NAME: Los Angeles, CA 90012 Central District, Unlimited Jurisdiction “8 erlor Court of California ‘ounty of Los Angeles PLAINTIFF: NEMAN BROTHERS & ASSOCS., INC., etc. AUG 31 2018 DEFENDANT: DARIAN GROUP, INC., etc., et al. $I es PR tive Officer/Clerk CASE NUMBERS hy (J RIGHT To ATTACH ORDER AND ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF Michael Rivera ATTACHMENT AFTER HEARING BC713236 (1) orDER FOR ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL WRIT OF ATTACHMENT AFTER HEARING 1. a. The application of plaintiff (name): NEMAN BROTHERS & ASSOC., INC., a California corporation for a right to attach order and order for issuance of writ of attachment (Can order for issuance of additional writ of attachment against the property of defendant (n; ; NMNY GROUP, LLC a New York limited liability company, dba came on for hearing as follows: NICOLE MILLER, dba NICOLE MILLER NY, dba NICOLE MILLER LA (1) Judge (name): Honorable > (2) Hearing date: August 31, 2018 “rime: 9: RCHEDL BRC! KLOFF, Judge (Crm: % b. The following persons were present at the hearing: (1) ) Plaintiff (name): (3) Plaintiffs attorney (name): NICD N- Tabibi (2)[_] Defendant (name): (4) Defendant's attorney (name): May N. Wellman FINDINGS 2. THE COURT FINDS. NMNY GROUP, LLC a New York limited liability a. Defendant (specify name): company, dba NICOLE MILLER, dba NICOLE MILLER NY, dba NICOLE MILLER LA isa [) natural person oO partnership (J unincorporated association ([) comoration [¥_] other (specify): a New York limited liability company b. The claim upon which the application is based is one upon which an attachment may be issued. c. Plaintiff has established the probable validity of the claim upon which the attachment is based. d. The attachment is not sought for a purpose other than the recovery on the claim upon which the attachment is based. e. The amount to be secured by the attachment is greater than zero. f. Wd Defendant failed to prove that all the property described in plaintiffs application is exempt from attachment. g. LZ] The following property of defendant, described in plaintiffs application €) Mc xt empt from attachment (specify): (2) lot exempt from attachment (specify): h. [] The following property, not described in plaintiff's application, claimed by defendant to be exempt, (1) [1] is exempt from attachment (specify): (2) [1] is not exempt from attachment (specify): * i. (2) An undertaking in the amount of $ 10,000.00 is required before a writ shall issue, and plaintiff TW has CT) has not filed an undertaking in that amou J. A Right to Attach Order was issued on (date): pAutust 34-2048 pursuant to [1] Code of Civil Procedure section 484.090 (on hearing) Co Ode of Civil Procedure section 485.220 (ex parte) k. [J other (specify): oes Wet Page 1of2 ner Form proved for tional Use RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER AFTER HEARING AND ORDER Code of Civil Proc., §§ 482.030, 484.080; ai Jui ‘Coundof Cali ia ‘Welfare & Institutions Code, § 15657.01 ‘AT-120 (Rev. July 1, 2010], FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF ATTACHMENT (Attachment) ‘www couiinfo.ca.gov