arrow left
arrow right
  • RAMON CERVANTES, Jr  vs.  STATE FARM AUTO INSURANCE, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • RAMON CERVANTES, Jr  vs.  STATE FARM AUTO INSURANCE, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • RAMON CERVANTES, Jr  vs.  STATE FARM AUTO INSURANCE, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • RAMON CERVANTES, Jr  vs.  STATE FARM AUTO INSURANCE, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • RAMON CERVANTES, Jr  vs.  STATE FARM AUTO INSURANCE, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • RAMON CERVANTES, Jr  vs.  STATE FARM AUTO INSURANCE, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • RAMON CERVANTES, Jr  vs.  STATE FARM AUTO INSURANCE, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
  • RAMON CERVANTES, Jr  vs.  STATE FARM AUTO INSURANCE, et alOTHER (CIVIL) document preview
						
                                

Preview

we CAUSE#DC-22-09593. PLAINTIFF IN THE DISTRICT COURTE py RAMON CERVANTES JR. 29 JUL +3 AN IG: &7 FELICI EISTRICTA PIT RE CLERK 8 AL LA CB.. S TEXAS vs 134TH ‘ ACEPUTY DEFENDANTS DALLAS COUNTY TEXA STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE . INSURANCE COMPANY AND JESTEN ROGERS, STATE FARM POLICY #1771666E0343G JAXTEN TRANSPORT LOGISTICS, THEIR LIABILITY COMPANY . PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO EXTEND TRIAL DATE AND TIME TO AQUIRE FROM DEFENDANTS. TO RESPONSES AND DOCUMENTS FROM DEFENDANTS NON-ANSWERS , FRAUDULENT BRIEFS AND HIDING REQUESTS FOR ,DEFENDANT JESTEN ROGERS TO PERSONALLY ANSWER ALL INTERROGATORIES BY RULE TRCP 190.3(B)(3) TRCP 197,MUST ANSWER EACH INTERROGAT , SEPARATELY,ORIES FULLY, FULLY, IN WRITING UNDER OATH. PLAINTIFF ASKS THIS COURT TO GRANT ADDITIONAL TIME TO TRIAL DATE,TO OBTAIN THE INTOROGATORIES ,OF WHICH DEFENDANTS HAVE PURPOSELY REFUSED TO DO SO,(A CD) IS NOT ACCEPTABLE BY LAWS. A. INTRODUCTION 1. PLAINTIFF IS RAMON CERVANTES JR. DEFENDANTS STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Paae 1 ,PEIVION RYVYERD, DIATE TARY FULLLY#L/ / LOOOEUS454 JAXTEN TRANSPORT LOGISTICS, THE COMPANYS LIABILITY COMPANY NAME AND CONTRACT. 2 PLAINTIFF SUES FOR AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY AND “INJURIES. 3.DISCOVERY IS LEVEL 2 CONTROL PLAN OF WHICH DEFENDANTS HAVE KNOWINGLY,AND PURPOSELY, TOTALLY AND ILLEGALY REFUSE TO FOLLOW TRCP RULES, DENYING ANY AND ALL REQUESTS,TO HAMPER PLAINTIFF TO A FAIR TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS,OF WHICH IS ANY AND ALL PLAINTIFFS BRIEFS ARE IN THE RECORD. 4. THIS TRIAL IS SET FOR JULY 10TH 2023.AND PLAINTIFF IS ASKING FOR TRIAL DATE BE MOVED TO DECEMBER 20TH 2023. MY MEDICAL TREATMENTS WILL CONTINUE TILL MY TREATMENTS MAY BE COMPLETED TO RETURN TO NORMAL LIFE AND TRY TO FIND A COMPETEN PERSONAL ATTORNEY TO MAKE SURE I WILL STOP THE CORRUPT DEFENDANTS BRIEFS ALONG WITH A BIASED JUDGES. FACTS 5. PLAINTIFF SENT TO DEFENDANTS FIRIST SET OF INTERROGOTORIES OCT 22,2020,AND NEVER ANSWERED. 6. DEFENDANTS ANSWERS WRE DUE 15 DAYS AFTER AND SERVICE:AND NEVER ANSWERED Page 2 * SUBJECT TO JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT , DISOBEYING ATTORNEYS CREED. 8. PLAINTIFF HAS BEEN UNDER DOCTORS CARE THAT WILL LAST A MINIMUN OF 8 MONTHS TO A YEAR,AND PLAINTIFF CANNOT TENDER TO THE COURT THE MONETARY PAIN ,DURESS , COURT COSTS,LOSS OF INCOME HARRASSMENT BY CROOKED LAWYERS 9.PLAINTIFF ATTACHES AFFIDAVITS TO THIS MOTION TO ESTABLISH FACTS NOT APPARENT FROM THE RECORD AND INCORPORATES THEM BY REFERENCE C ARGUMENT & AUTHORITIES PLAINTIFF ASKS THIS COURT TO GRANT ADDITIONAL TIME TO COMPEL REPEATED REQUESTS FOR DOCUMENTS AND SANTION DEFENDANTS SANCTIONS FOR THEIR INSISTANCE TO HARM PLAINTIFF OF HIS CONSTITITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO TRIAL,AND USING BIASED COURTS AND JUDGES TO PERPETUATE ILLEGAL PANDERING. PLAINTIFF HAS SHOWN GOOD CAUSE UNDER TRCP RULE 191.1 TRCP 5 CONCLUSION 10. PLAINTIFF HAS BROUGHT FORTH TO THIS COURT ALL BREIFS BY LAW ARE CORRECT,AND DEFENDANTS HAVE NO Page 3 t ;DEFENSE AS THEY KNOW THAT DEFENDANT WAS AT FAULT,BY THEIR OWN ADMISSION(ATTACHED) . PRAYER 11. FOR ALL OF THE ABOVE REASONS COURT MUST SIGN AN ORDER GIVING PLAINTIFF ALL THE CORRECT DOCUMENTS ,ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES FROM DEFENDANTS, THIS BY COURTS SUBMISSION,NOT NEEDING ANY IN COURT HEARING,AS BRIEFS DEFENDS PL TIFFS DEMANDS.TO EXTEND TIME OF. TRIAL DATE che > RESPECTFULLY, RAMON CERVANTES JR PRO-SE YET THIS COURT ALLOWS FRIVILOUS ILLEGAL BRIEFS TO STAND Page 4 CAUSE #0C-22-09593 ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO EXTEND TRIAL DATE AFTER CONSIDDERING THE BRIEFS,EVIDENCE ON FILE AND ARGUMENTS OF PLAINTIFF(PRO-SE) I MUST OBEY THE TRCP RULES SHOW NO BIAS,AND GRANT PLAINTIFF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD AGAINST CORRUPT DEFENDANTS AND THEIR ATTORNEYS. GRANTS THIS MOTION AND ALL RELIEF PLAINTIFF IS ENTITLED TO WHETHER PRAYED FOR OR- NOT. SIGNED ON . 2023 PRESIDING JUDGE Pade 1 4 CAUSE#DC-22-09593 PLAINTIFF IN THE DISTRICT COURT RAMON CERVANTES JR. VS 134th DEFENDANTS DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY AND JESTEN ROGERS POLICY #1771666E0343G ETAL CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE PLAINTIFF,RAMON CERVANTES JR. CERTIFIES THAT ALL PLEADINGS AND CLAIMS WERE SENT ON “7> 3~22 TO DEFENDANTS VIA USPS CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN 1 RECEIPT INCLUDED. ons bo De PLAINTIFF,RAMON CERVANTES JR. Naan 4 at d. . Plaintiffs claim for prop damage in the amount of $4,367.11 was paid. ow Ss 4s ~4+—GAu 9 TAAnyISwitriSh ess statements d lescribed in Rule 192.3(h). D /EFENDANTS! INITIAL DISCLOSURES Page 6