arrow left
arrow right
  • NOREEN DELVORINE BODDENHYDE VS KEVIN ROBERT HEINEcivil document preview
  • NOREEN DELVORINE BODDENHYDE VS KEVIN ROBERT HEINEcivil document preview
						
                                

Preview

N ‘F _ ( 1 LAW OFFICE OF TIMOTHY I. O'SHEA BY: Jacklyn J Kim -~ BAR N0 No. 250841 l 2 Attorneys At Law 3 535 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 1100 §“”wl:£I_.§gm ‘ Siendaieg CA,’ :$o3F I I n..w osnn.-,».n'f..m“"‘ 4 ""-'""‘..' "i'f.'.’§; e §I.'. .;§Z'” ‘ mp ’818(/956-9100 HARD 9 2018 W 5 Fax: 818/956-9191 llaaostaé R. Cantor, Executive Oicer/Clerk -< 6 Attorneys for Defendant Cm“ V" W Iv -"n ~l l 7 KEVIN ROBERT HEINE 8 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNDX l 1° COUNTY or LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT — LIMITED CIVIL J; 11 12 ‘ 3 13 NOREEN DELVORINE BODDENI-IYDE, CASE NO. 17STLC05l00 I 14 PLA1'NTIFF, ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ~ 15 VS. 1 15 KEVIN ROBERT HEINE, MARIA 17 MARGARITA KELRING AND DOES 1 TO 50, INCLUSIVE, ‘ 18 19 DEFENDANTS. 1 2° COMES NOW defendant, KEVIN ROBERT HEINE, and answers the complaint of i l 21 plaintiff, NOREEN DELVORINE BODDENHYDE, as follows: i 22 Pursuant to California , Section 431.30, this answering 3 - 23 defendant denies both generally and specically, each and every allegation contained in each l 24 ' l and every paragraph of said complaint; defendant further denies that plaintiff has been 2 5 damaged in any sum or sums whatsoever, or at all, whether it is alleged in plaintiffs 26 ‘ complaint or otherwise. 27 28 2;: __*___________,:‘...7._..______*.._ l ANswr:_§ TO COMPLAINT tilt’) ‘ M",