Document for SHARZAD NOVAHIAN VS xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ET AL

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 11/16/2021 06:23 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk




                                             1   Nahal Zarnighian (Cal. Bar No. 313305)
                                                 zarnighiann@ballardspahr.com
                                             2   BALLARD SPAHR LLP
                                                 2029 Century Park East, Suite 1400
                                             3   Los Angeles, CA 90067-2915
                                                 Telephone: 424.204.4400
                                             4   Facsimile: 424.204.4350

                                             5   Attorney Specially Appearing for Plaintiff
                                                 SHARZAD NOVAHIAN
                                             6

                                             7

                                             8                   SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                                             9                             FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

                                            10

                                            11   SHARZAD NOVAHIAN                                      )   Case No. BC718290
       Los Angeles, California 90067-2915




                                                                                                       )
       2029 Century Park East, Suite 1400




                                            12                Plaintiff,                               )   [Assigned for all purposes to the
                                                                                                       )   Honorable Kristin S. Escalante]
              Ballard Spahr LLP




                                            13         v.                                              )
                                                                                                       )   REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S
                                            14                                                         )   MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1 TO EXCLUDE
                                                 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;                                 )   THE UNDISCLOSED TESTIMONY AND
                                            15   xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx GROUP &                           )   OPINION OF DEFENDANTS’ EXPERT
                                                 MORTGAGE SERVICES INC.                                )   BETH CHRISMAN
                                            16                                                         )
                                                              Defendants                               )
                                            17                                                         )
                                                                                                       )   Hearing:                        November 19, 2021
                                            18                                                         )   Time:                           9:30 a.m.
                                                                                                       )   Department:                     24
                                            19                                                         )
                                                                                                       )
                                            20                                                         )
                                                                                                       )
                                            21                                                         )
                                                                                                       )
                                            22                                                         )
                                                                                                       )
                                            23                                                         )

                                            24

                                            25

                                            26

                                            27

                                            28

                                                                                                           1
                                                                   REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1