arrow left
arrow right
  • SANTA ANITA SHOPPINGTOWN LP VS URBAN HOME INC ET AL Unlawful Detainer/Commercial (not drugs or wrongful eviction) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • SANTA ANITA SHOPPINGTOWN LP VS URBAN HOME INC ET AL Unlawful Detainer/Commercial (not drugs or wrongful eviction) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

U’3+ 1 Brian D. Huben, Cal. Bar No. 134354 hubenb@ba1lardspahr.com 2 Nicholas M. Gross, Cal. Bar No. 285403 grossn@ballardspahr.com . FQLEQ 3 Tanya M. Taylor, Cal. Bar No. 312881 Sugenor Court of California taylortm@ballardSpahr.com °”'"’' °' ‘-°$ Angeles 4 BALLARD SPAHR LLP 2029 Century Park East, Suite 800 1O 56 %~: r.: : ;~;-ea:0292235909 Facsimile: 424.204.4350 A ony Wilburn ' °°"“‘V 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff SANTA ANITA SHOPPINGTOWN LP 8 9 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 12 SANTA ANITA SHOPPINGTOWN LP, a ) CASE NO. BC7168l4 Delaware limited partnership, ) 13 ) [Assigned to Hon. Michael Lineld] Plaintiff, ) » 14 ) PLAINTIFF SANTA ANITA vs. ) SHOPPINGTOWN L.P.’S OPPOSITION 15 ) TO DEFENDANT URBAN HOME, INC.’S ) EX PARTE APPLICATION TO 16 URBAN HOME, INC., a California corporation, ) CONTINUE TRIAL AND RELIEF FROM doing business as “URBAN HOME”; and DOES ) WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL; 17 1 through 10, inclusive; . ) DECLARATION OF TANYA M. ) TAYLOR 18 ) Defendants. ) Hearin 19 ) Date: October 10, 2018 20 g Time: 8:30 a.m. ' , ) Place: Dept. “34” 21 3 Complaint Filed: August 10, 2018 : 22 ) Trial Date: October 1, 2018 PM " 23 . . Santa Anita Plaintiff - . Shoppingtown ,, L.P. ( ., Landlord ) opposes defendant Urban 24 Home Inc.’s (“Tenant”) Ex Parte application for an extension of the current trial date and E12; 25 relief from waiver of right to a jury trial (“Application”). The Application, which was 26 orally noticed on October 4, 20181 should be denied because Tenant (1) has caused 27 “”‘*“‘—'—*_”"_ 1 Although notice was given nearly a week past, Landlord has yet to receive a copy of any 28 moving papers and, thus, is forced to oppose the Application in the blind. DMWEST #l8l43998 v2 1 PLAINTIFF SANTA ANITA SHOPPINGTOWN L.P.’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT URBAN HOME [NC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND RELIEF FROM WAIVER TO A JURY TRIAL