On August 10, 2018 a
Notice of Related Case
was filed
involving a dispute between
Santa Anita Shoppingtown Lp,
and
Dba Urban Home Dba "Urban Home",
Urban Home Inc.,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
‘ 0 * O CM-015
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Brian D. Huben (SBN 134354)
Nicholas M. Gross (SBN 285403); Tanya M. Taylor (SBN 312881)
‘ BALLARD SPAHR LLP ' .
2 02 9 Century Park East , suite 8 0 0 ' suP erior Court 0l'Calit'ornia
{L An elem
Los Angeles, CA 90067 C°““‘V° °’ 3
TELEPHONE NO.: 424 -204 -4400 FAXNO. (Optional): 424 -203 -4350
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): 19
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Santa Anita Sho o o in town LP
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS Ange les Sherri R. Carter, Exe tive Ofcer/Clefk
STREET ADDRESS: 1 1 1 N . Hi 1 1 Street By D€P“‘Y
MAILING ADDRESS: 1 11 N . Hi ll Street ' “S”
CITYANDZIP cooe: Los Angeles , CA 90012
BRANCH NAME: Central Di strict
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Santa Anita Shoppingtown LP CASE NUMBER:
BC7 1 6 8 l 4 '
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Urban Home , Inc . ; et: al . JUDICIAL OFFICER:
Linfield
DEPT.:
Identity, in chronological order according to date of ling, all cases related to the case referenced above.
1. a. Title: Santa Anita Shoppingtown LP vs . Urban Home , Inc .
b. Case number: l8STCVO 53 14
c. Court: X same as above
E other state or federal court (name and address):
d. Department: "28 "
e. Case type: limited civil unlimited civil :1 probate [:1 family law [: other (specify):
f. Filing date: November 16 , 2 0 18
g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" l:| Yes x No
h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply):
[:1 involves the same parties and is based on the same or similarclaims.
C] arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of
the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact.
involves claims against. title to, possession of, or damages to the same property.
E: is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication ofjudicial resources if heard by differentjudges.
[:1 Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h
i. Status of case: -
pending
Z dismissed E: with I: without prejudice
W [:1 disposed of by judgment
‘!.?"’
2. a. Title:
W) Case number:
is. | b.
c. Court: same as above
1:) other state or federal court (name and address):
® d. Department:
R
Pas 1 of 3
« ’ Form Approved for Optional Use a] Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300
SO nS.
‘ us
Document Filed Date
November 19, 2018
Case Filing Date
August 10, 2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
‘ 0 * O CM-015 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Brian D. Huben (SBN 134354) Nicholas M. Gross (SBN 285403); Tanya M. Taylor (SBN 312881) ‘ BALLARD SPAHR LLP ' . 2 02 9 Century Park East , suite 8 0 0 ' suP erior Court 0l'Calit'ornia {L An elem Los Angeles, CA 90067 C°““‘V° °’ 3 TELEPHONE NO.: 424 -204 -4400 FAXNO. (Optional): 424 -203 -4350 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): 19 ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Santa Anita Sho o o in town LP SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS Ange les Sherri R. Carter, Exe tive Ofcer/Clefk STREET ADDRESS: 1 1 1 N . Hi 1 1 Street By D€P“‘Y MAILING ADDRESS: 1 11 N . Hi ll Street ' “S” CITYANDZIP cooe: Los Angeles , CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Central Di strict PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Santa Anita Shoppingtown LP CASE NUMBER: BC7 1 6 8 l 4 ' DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Urban Home , Inc . ; et: al . JUDICIAL OFFICER: Linfield DEPT.: Identity, in chronological order according to date of ling, all cases related to the case referenced above. 1. a. Title: Santa Anita Shoppingtown LP vs . Urban Home , Inc . b. Case number: l8STCVO 53 14 c. Court: X same as above E other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: "28 " e. Case type: limited civil unlimited civil :1 probate [:1 family law [: other (specify): f. Filing date: November 16 , 2 0 18 g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" l:| Yes x No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): [:1 involves the same parties and is based on the same or similarclaims. C] arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. involves claims against. title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. E: is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication ofjudicial resources if heard by differentjudges. [:1 Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h i. Status of case: - pending Z dismissed E: with I: without prejudice W [:1 disposed of by judgment ‘!.?"’ 2. a. Title: W) Case number: is. | b. c. Court: same as above 1:) other state or federal court (name and address): ® d. Department: R Pas 1 of 3 « ’ Form Approved for Optional Use a] Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300 SO nS. ‘ us