arrow left
arrow right
  • CESAR COTTO VS PINCHES ANAYA LLC Civil Rights/Discrimination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • CESAR COTTO VS PINCHES ANAYA LLC Civil Rights/Discrimination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 06/11/2019 06:07 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk CM-110 AHORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT AHORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Brandon S, Reif (SBN 214706); Shiqi W, BorjQin (317147) REIF LAW GROUP, P.C. 1925 Century Park East, Suite 1700 TELEPHONE NO.: (310)-494-6500 FAX NO. (Optional): E-MAIL ADDRESS /Optional): docket@reiflawgroup.com ATTORNEY FOR /Name): Defendant Pinches Anaya LLC SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDREss: 111 North Hill Street MAIUNGADDREss: 111 North Hill Street cnY AND zIP coDE: Los Angeles, 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Cesar Cotto DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Pinches Anaya LLC CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): m UNLIMITED CASE (Amount demanded D LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded is $25,000 19STCV06654 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: June 28, 2019 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 32 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): D Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. W This statement is submitted by party (name): Defendant Pinches Anaya LLC b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. D All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in [ZJ complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Violations of the Unruh Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code section 51, et seq. Pa e1 of5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3. 720-3. 730 CM-110 (Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov