On February 26, 2019 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Cotto Cesar,
and
Pinches Anaya Llc,
for Civil Rights/Discrimination (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 06/11/2019 06:07 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
AHORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT AHORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Brandon S, Reif (SBN 214706); Shiqi W, BorjQin (317147)
REIF LAW GROUP, P.C.
1925 Century Park East, Suite 1700
TELEPHONE NO.: (310)-494-6500 FAX NO. (Optional):
E-MAIL ADDRESS /Optional): docket@reiflawgroup.com
ATTORNEY FOR /Name): Defendant Pinches Anaya LLC
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDREss: 111 North Hill Street
MAIUNGADDREss: 111 North Hill Street
cnY AND zIP coDE: Los Angeles, 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Cesar Cotto
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Pinches Anaya LLC
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): m UNLIMITED CASE
(Amount demanded
D LIMITED CASE
(Amount demanded is $25,000
19STCV06654
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: June 28, 2019 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 32 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
D Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. W This statement is submitted by party (name): Defendant Pinches Anaya LLC
b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date):
b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. D All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in [ZJ complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Violations of the Unruh Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code section 51, et seq.
Pa e1 of5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court,
rules 3. 720-3. 730
CM-110 (Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
June 11, 2019
Case Filing Date
February 26, 2019
Category
Civil Rights/Discrimination (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 10/01/2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.