On March 25, 2019 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Ryan Michael J.,
and
Lattie Malanga & Libertino Llp,
Libertino Teresa,
Malanga Gerald,
for Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
. ‘ 1
' S"8:~my<»'§of.'.L”l-,.'§A"9€Ie’sma
u P
Celffo
%
DEC 1 0 20
2 “ma . . ._ '9
3 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALMICo1,,,
. 1 :_ r:-_ D
4 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - WEST DISTRICT
5
6 MICHAEL j_ RYAN, CASE NO: 19SMCVOO587
7 P1aintiff(s), - ORDER GRANTING
3 PLAlNTIFF’S MOTIONS TO COMPEL
9 "3' INITIAL RESPONSES
10 LATTIE MALANGA & LIBERTINO, LLP, a Dept; R
business entity; GERALD MALANGA, an Hearing Date; 12/10/19
11 1I1d1V1dU.al; an Hearing Time; 8:30am
individual; and Does 1 through 15, inclusive,
12
13 Defendant(s).
14 1. Facts and Relevant Procedural History
15 Plaintiff Michael Ryan (“plaintiff”) filed this action on 3/25/19 against defendants Lattie,
16 Malanga, & Libertino, LLP, Gerald Malanga, and Teresa Libertino (collectively “defendants”)
17 for breach of an oral contract, wherein plaintiff, an attorney, was to provide legal services for
defendants.
18
19 The complaint alleges causes of action for breach of contract and quantum meruit/unjust
20 enrichment against defendants.
21 Plaintiff served written discovery consisting of demands for production, special
22 interrogatories, and form interrogatories on defendants on 6/5/19. (Monarch Decl., ‘][4.) Responses
23 were due 7/10/19. (Id. at ‘][5.) None of the defendants requested an extension. (lbia'.) On 7/ 16/ 19,
24 plaintiff sent a letter to defendants stating no responses had been received, no extension granted,
25 and therefore all objections were waived. (Wakefield Decl., ‘][6.) The letter requested responses
26 from defendants by 7/26/19, without objections, and that if no responses were received, plaintiff
27 would file motions to compel. (Ibid.)
28
l
Document Filed Date
December 10, 2019
Case Filing Date
March 25, 2019
Category
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 10/06/2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
. ‘ 1 ' S"8:~my<»'§of.'.L”l-,.'§A"9€Ie’sma u P Celffo % DEC 1 0 20 2 “ma . . ._ '9 3 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALMICo1,,, . 1 :_ r:-_ D 4 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - WEST DISTRICT 5 6 MICHAEL j_ RYAN, CASE NO: 19SMCVOO587 7 P1aintiff(s), - ORDER GRANTING 3 PLAlNTIFF’S MOTIONS TO COMPEL 9 "3' INITIAL RESPONSES 10 LATTIE MALANGA & LIBERTINO, LLP, a Dept; R business entity; GERALD MALANGA, an Hearing Date; 12/10/19 11 1I1d1V1dU.al; an Hearing Time; 8:30am individual; and Does 1 through 15, inclusive, 12 13 Defendant(s). 14 1. Facts and Relevant Procedural History 15 Plaintiff Michael Ryan (“plaintiff”) filed this action on 3/25/19 against defendants Lattie, 16 Malanga, & Libertino, LLP, Gerald Malanga, and Teresa Libertino (collectively “defendants”) 17 for breach of an oral contract, wherein plaintiff, an attorney, was to provide legal services for defendants. 18 19 The complaint alleges causes of action for breach of contract and quantum meruit/unjust 20 enrichment against defendants. 21 Plaintiff served written discovery consisting of demands for production, special 22 interrogatories, and form interrogatories on defendants on 6/5/19. (Monarch Decl., ‘][4.) Responses 23 were due 7/10/19. (Id. at ‘][5.) None of the defendants requested an extension. (lbia'.) On 7/ 16/ 19, 24 plaintiff sent a letter to defendants stating no responses had been received, no extension granted, 25 and therefore all objections were waived. (Wakefield Decl., ‘][6.) The letter requested responses 26 from defendants by 7/26/19, without objections, and that if no responses were received, plaintiff 27 would file motions to compel. (Ibid.) 28 l