arrow left
arrow right
  • RICHARD YCAZA VS TARGET CORPORATION, ET AL. Premise Liability (e.g., dangerous conditions of property, slip/trip and fall, dog attack, etc.) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • RICHARD YCAZA VS TARGET CORPORATION, ET AL. Premise Liability (e.g., dangerous conditions of property, slip/trip and fall, dog attack, etc.) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/13/2019 12:17 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Pryor,Deputy Clerk 1 Angela M. Powell (State Bar No. 191876) amp@manningllp.com 2 Catherine Cranford (State Bar No. 318879) cyc@manningllp.com 3 MANNING & KASS ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP 4 801 S. Figueroa St, 15th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-3012 5 Telephone: (213) 624-6900 Facsimile: (213) 624-6999 6 Attorneys for Defendants, TARGET 7 CORPORATION AND PRISCILLA ZAMORA 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 11 RICHARD YCAZA, Case No. 19STCV05779 12 Plaintiff, ANSWER TO COMPLAINT; DEMAND 13 FOR JURY TRIAL v. 14 Dept.: 4A TARGET CORPORATION, PRISCILLA 15 ZAMORA, and DOES 1-50, Inclusive, The Hon. Stephen I. Goorvitch 16 Defendant. Action Filed: 02/19/2019 17 18 19 Pursuant to Sections 431.10, et seq., of the California Code of Civil Procedure, defendants 20 TARGET CORPORATION and PRISCILLA ZAMORA ("defendants"), answer the Complaint of 21 plaintiff RICHARD YCAZA ("plaintiff") as follows. 22 GENERAL DENIAL 23 1. Defendants deny generally and specifically each and every allegation in the 24 Complaint, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure §431.30, and further deny that plaintiff was 25 injured, or that plaintiff sustained, or will sustain damages in the sums alleged in the Complaint, or 26 in any sum, or at all. 27 /// 28 /// ANSWER TO COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TITLE