Letter,Correspondence: Board Of Education Of The Mount Vernon City School District v. City Of Mount Vernon, Mount Vernon Industrial Development Agency, Richard Thomas

• 

						
                                
Preview
                                FILED:         WESTCHESTER              COUNTY         CLERK       09/13/2017             10:18        AM            INDEX    NO.   69595/2016
   NYSCEF     DOC.   NO.   76                                                                                RECEIVED      NYSCEF:     09/13/2017
                                                 COUNTY     COURT     OF THE    STATE OF NEW YORK
                                                                 RICHARD     1. DARONCO
                                                       WESTCHESTER       COUNTY     COURTHOUSE
                                                  III DR.  MARTIN    LUTHER     KING,  JR. BOULEVARD
                                                           WHITE   PLAINS,   NEW    YORK    10601
                                                                  VOICE:   (914) 824-5401
                                                                   FAX:   (914) 824-5887
                   CHAMBERS    OF                             DIGITAL   FAX:   (212) 401-9257
                "ON.  StiSAN CACACE




                                                                               September   13,2017


                Thomas   Scapoli, Esq.
                Ingerman  Smith, LLP
                Attorneys for Petitioner
                550  Mamaroneck   Avenue,  Suite 209
                Harrison, New  York   10528

                Thomas   A. Telesca, Esq.
                Ruskin  Moscou  Faltischek, P.C.
                Attorneys  for Respondents
                1425 RXR    Plaza
                Uniondale,  New  York  11556

                                           Re: HOE of Mount    Vernon City School  Districtv City of Mount Vernon,  et at.
                                            Index No. 69595/16

                Dear Counselors:
                         This Court  is in receipt
                                                 of recentcorrespondence   sent on behalfof all parties
                                                                                                      by the petitioner'sattorney,Thomas
                Scapoli, Esq.,dated  September  I, 2017, through which  all parties
                                                                                  have jointly requested thatthis Court hold the
                determination  of the above-referenced Article 78 proceeding  in abeyance while settlement discussions are being pursued.
                In this regard,although the Court will accede to your jointrequest and hold a determination of thismatter in abeyance  until
                furthernotice is received from the parties,the Court will also make itself available
                                                                                                   to conduct a conference  with counsel for
                the partiesin an effortto assist
                                               with your  ongoing effortsto fashion a mutually agreeable disposition to resolvethis special
                proceeding.
                         Upon  consideration of your joint request,thisCourt  will holdthe determination of the above-referenced  Article78
                proceeding  in abeyance, awaiting further communication   from the partiesregarding the scheduling'of a conference, or the
                restorationof this caseto active consideration status.




                                                                        1  of   1