Motion,Ex Parte: HERNANDEZ -V- MS. GEE'S HOUSE , ET AL Print

• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                ~     ORIGINAL                     VY


     Steven Zelig, SBN 094654
     WLA LEGAL SERVICES, INC.                                      SUPERIOR c OURT OF
                                                                                       CALIFORNIA
                                                                     COUNTY O} F SAN
     1046 Princeton Drive #201                                        SAN BERNARDINO.       ‘DINO
                                                                                      DIS TRICT
     Marina del Rey, CA 90292
     Telephone: 310/393-6702                                              MAR 15 2023
     Facsimile: 310/393-6703

     Attorneys for Plaintiffs                                    ” ace
                          SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                                      COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

     ARNOLD HERNANDEZ, Individually, and by | Case No.: CIVDS1825520
     and through his Successor-in-Interest, Anthony
     Hernandez; THE    ESTATE OF ARNOLD
10   HERNANDEZ;       individually; BARBARA           OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO ENFORCE
ll
     HERNANDEZ,       individually; and DAVID         PURPORTED “SETTLEMENT”;
     HERNANDEZ,       individually,                   DECLARATIONS OF STEVEN ZELIG,
12                                                    BARBARA HERNANDEZ, AND ANTHONY
                     Plaintiff,
                                                      HERNANDEZ
13
     vs.
14
     MS. GEE’S HOUSE; GEORGETTE CHIN;                 DATE: March 28, 2023
15
     MS. GEE; GEORGETTA (LAST NAME                    TIME: 8:30 a.m.
16   UNKNOWN); GEORGETTE HARRIS;                      DEPT: : S14
     DORSETTE SMITH; JURUPA PHARMACY,
7    INC.; JURUPA VALLEY PHARMACY, INC.;
18
     COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; SUKH
     DEV SINGH KHALSA, DNP, P.M.H.N.P.;
19   RIVERSIDE PSYCHIATRIC MEDICAL
     GROUP; SHAWN PORTILLO; DANNY
20   PORTILLO; DEDEE ZUSAG; TONY
21
     PORTILLO; and DOES 1 through 200,
     INCLUSIVE,
22
                     Defendants
23

24

25

26

27

28

                      OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO ENFORCE PURPORTED “SETTLEMENT”,
                                                  1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
      I          THE TRAGIC COMEDY OF ERRORS.
      IL.         SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION.
      Ii.   GENERAL CONTRACT FORMATION, AND PLAINTIFFS’ COMMENTS AND
      APPLICATION. ..
      Iv.         CHRONOLOGY OF PERTINENT PROCEDURAL EVENTS:
            A.    November Of 2022. oo. .cccecscssssesssssssssssseeeesssnescssenssceneseeseseenenecusseeeeneceeseseeenesiesesneaestenseneas 7
      Vv. APPLICABLE SPECIAL RULES RELATIVE TO MEDIATION, AND PLAINTIFFS’
      COMMENTS AND APPLICATION THEREOF                                                                                                    11
      VII.        THE CASES CITED BY DR. SUMMEROUR DO NOT SUPPORT HIS POSITION. . 12
            A.    Weddington, supra, supports Plaintiffs                                                                                  12
            B. This case bears no resemblance to JBB Investment Partners v. Fair (2019) 37 Cal.App. 5" 1.
10                                                                                                     12
il          C.    This case bears no resemblance to Blix Street Records, Inc. v. Cassidy (2010) 191
            Cal. App.4! 39 (Cassidy). ..ccecsscsssssesssssssssnneesesssssnsecesssssnssssceeennannasececeennnueetecesenmeretey 13
12
          Vil.     CONCLUSION:                                                                                                             14
13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 27

 28

                              OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO ENFORCE PURPORTED “SETTLEMENT”;