arrow left
arrow right
  • Robert Harris v. Intimo, Inc., Nathan Nathan, Tommy Nathan, Moris Zilkha, Prestige Employee Administrators, Inc. A/K/A Prestige Employee Administrators, Prestige Employee Administrators Ii, Inc. A/K/A Prestige Employee Administrators, John Does 1 - 10, Abc Corps. 1 - 8 Commercial - Contract document preview
  • Robert Harris v. Intimo, Inc., Nathan Nathan, Tommy Nathan, Moris Zilkha, Prestige Employee Administrators, Inc. A/K/A Prestige Employee Administrators, Prestige Employee Administrators Ii, Inc. A/K/A Prestige Employee Administrators, John Does 1 - 10, Abc Corps. 1 - 8 Commercial - Contract document preview
  • Robert Harris v. Intimo, Inc., Nathan Nathan, Tommy Nathan, Moris Zilkha, Prestige Employee Administrators, Inc. A/K/A Prestige Employee Administrators, Prestige Employee Administrators Ii, Inc. A/K/A Prestige Employee Administrators, John Does 1 - 10, Abc Corps. 1 - 8 Commercial - Contract document preview
  • Robert Harris v. Intimo, Inc., Nathan Nathan, Tommy Nathan, Moris Zilkha, Prestige Employee Administrators, Inc. A/K/A Prestige Employee Administrators, Prestige Employee Administrators Ii, Inc. A/K/A Prestige Employee Administrators, John Does 1 - 10, Abc Corps. 1 - 8 Commercial - Contract document preview
						
                                

Preview

INDEX NO. 650175/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 106 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/22/2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: K AKO Donn na PART ZO 7 Justice \ Index Number : 650175/2017 TGA. woenwe, KS8V7S\N1 motion vate _7/ 7 cir HARRIS, ROBERT — / “| vs. INTIMO, INC. Over MOTION SEQ. NO. l SEQUENCE NUMBER : 003 COMPEL ~ The following papers, numbered 1 to , were read on this motion to/for aes Notice of Motion/Order to Show Cause — Affidavits — Exhibits { jo(s). Answering Affidavits — Exhibits [No Replying Affidavits ENojs), Upon the foregoing papers, it is ordered that this motion is ves olecd in (22-4 wy svad- dy We ath chic 8A plahwrn ch bke Anat Dated: Ll- 21-9 HON. tof L\ J.S.C. NON 4, CHECK ONE: ..... . [) CASE DISPOSED (7 NON-FINAL DISPOSITION 2. CHECK AS APPROPRIATE: ..... MOTION 1s: ([] GRANTED (DENIED (GRANTED IN PART OTHER 3. CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: ....... CISETTLE ORDER CISUBMIT ORDER (Do not Post CJFIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT (REFERENCE 1 of 2 (FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 1172272019 10734 _AMy HoH 65 034512017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 106 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/22/2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK Haw INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT PART + U STIPULATION yh 0 Pa. ef «| INDEX NO. MOTION CALENDAR NO. DATE IT 1S HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the below-named attorney(s) as follows: with Respect Pe oN. Neithan avo I Nethan Z My Daitemen qua Phat As oil conform of thy” cecen) by Qras Fy * ef? deved ther eutere PY fone fle . (re doch an L Lranaolsl, srw fespect ts emarls ‘Loatmo Ks pads ecume ation 7“ shis& che-7 Rejarde4 Prod chin (recess, To TR Ahe pssee vw paso to - Ww D s will pre vo Widows Co ute ato foe nedy, °F Theil Par gew Socral Ceuty nembes calf tive of DI5 ek iutwe As will orev short stukment 25 Ke Knew lge KH Ge fasse> 4 line DENS BISoQS AYN SAN . Thx reaalwes 292 TaN Hse yeaemke a i \ Attorney for Plaintiff As L, y for So Ordered. g Attorney for Defendant” ENTER: yO ar Mw. iy ‘SC-8G (rev 2/86) Me (I.S:Cs Cae, on seo cow pts bcuved 2 of 2 OME