On May 06, 2019 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Moreira, Tifany,
and
Does 1-50,
University Of Redlands, A California, Non-Profit Organization,
for Employment - Complex
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
\y \r
MELMED LAW GROUP P.C.
Melmed (SBN 29021 8)
Jonathan
jm@melmedlaw.com
180] Century Park East, Suite 850
Los Angeles, California 90067
Phone: (310) 824-3828
Fax: (310) 862-6851
F i L END
ACKERMANN & TILAJEF, P.C. E,‘OU,.,.§§?£E€E’~‘-E‘ {*3-
T
Craig Ackerman (SBN 229832) "qmg
\OOOHONUIAWNH
m 1:?5,‘ , .
1s?"
cja@ackermanntilajef.com
l 180 South Beverly Drive, Suite
61 0 m a ‘
‘
Los Angeles, California 90035
.5,
Phone: (310) 277-0614 ‘
’m— M
-'
Fax: (310) 277-0635 ‘
;.
LNm/x noxL‘a-m?
.
’
W?
,.
L_LPJ‘f
Attorneys for Plaintiff, the Putative Class, and the Aggrieved Employees
SUPERIOR COURT 0F THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
TIFANY MOREIRA, an individual, on Case Number: CIVDSl913813
behalf herself, the State of California, as a
private attorney general, and on behalf of all [W] order Grantmg Prehmmary
_ . .
others Similarly Situated, Approval of Class Actlon Settlement
. _ Date: January 21, 2021
Plamtlff’
Time: 9:00 am.
NNNNNNNNNH—‘hfii—‘Hr—lb—At—Iv—‘r—I
Dept.: $23
V-
Judge: Hon. Donald Alvarez
UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS, a Complaint Filed: May 2019 6,
OONONMAUJNHOQOOQONUl-RMNHO
California nonprofit organization; and DOES F’Afc Flled: December 21 2020 5
TO Trlal Date: None Set
1 50, inclusive,
Defendant.
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL 0F CLAss ACTION SETTLEMENT
\r \w
ORDER
This matter having come for hearing on January 21, 2021, regarding Plaintiff’s
unopposed
Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement “Moti0n”) on the terms
(the set forth
in the Class Action Settlement Agreement attached t0 the Declaration
0f Jonathan Melmed in
Support 0f Plaintiff‘s Motion for Preliminary Approval of
Class Action Settlement as Exhibit 1
to the Declaration of Jonathan Melmed in Support of Plaintiff‘s Motion for Preliminary Approval
(the “Settlement”). Having considered the Settlement, all papers and proceedings held herein, and
having reviewed the entire record in this action, the court hereby finds and orders:
1. The court grants preliminary approval of the Settlement and the “Class”
(as that
10 term is defined in the Motion) based upon the terms set forth in the Settlement. All terms used
11 herein shall have the same meaning as defined in the Motion. The resolution set forth in the
12 Settlement appears to be fair, adequate, and reasonable to the Settlement Class.
13 2. The Settlement falls within the range 0f reasonableness and is presumptively valid,
14 subject only t0 any objections that may be raised at the final fairness hearing and final approval by
15 this court.
16 3. A final fairness hearing 0n the question 0f whether the proposed
Settlement, the
17 attorneys’ fees and costs to Class Counsel, and the Class Representative’s enhancement award
18 should be finally approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate as to the members of the Class is
19 scheduled in Department $23 on the date and time set forth in the
implementation schedule in
20 paragraph 10 below.
21 4. This court approves, as t0 form and content, the Class
Notice and Share Form
22 (“Class Notice”) to be distributed to the Class pursuant
to the Settlement in substantially the same
23 form as is attached to the Settlement as Exhibit A. The Court approves the procedure for Class
24 Members t0 participate in, to opt out of, and t0 object t0 the Settlement as set forth in the
25 Settlement.
26 5. The court directs the mailing of the Class Notice by first class mail to the Class
27 Members in accordance with the implementation schedule set forth below. The Court finds the
28 dates selected for the mailing and distribution 0f the
Notice, as set forth in the implementation
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL 0F CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT
Document Filed Date
January 20, 2021
Case Filing Date
May 06, 2019
Category
Employment - Complex
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
\y \r MELMED LAW GROUP P.C. Melmed (SBN 29021 8) Jonathan jm@melmedlaw.com 180] Century Park East, Suite 850 Los Angeles, California 90067 Phone: (310) 824-3828 Fax: (310) 862-6851 F i L END ACKERMANN & TILAJEF, P.C. E,‘OU,.,.§§?£E€E’~‘-E‘ {*3- T Craig Ackerman (SBN 229832) "qmg \OOOHONUIAWNH m 1:?5,‘ , . 1s?" cja@ackermanntilajef.com l 180 South Beverly Drive, Suite 61 0 m a ‘ ‘ Los Angeles, California 90035 .5, Phone: (310) 277-0614 ‘ ’m— M -' Fax: (310) 277-0635 ‘ ;. LNm/x noxL‘a-m? . ’ W? ,. L_LPJ‘f Attorneys for Plaintiff, the Putative Class, and the Aggrieved Employees SUPERIOR COURT 0F THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TIFANY MOREIRA, an individual, on Case Number: CIVDSl913813 behalf herself, the State of California, as a private attorney general, and on behalf of all [W] order Grantmg Prehmmary _ . . others Similarly Situated, Approval of Class Actlon Settlement . _ Date: January 21, 2021 Plamtlff’ Time: 9:00 am. NNNNNNNNNH—‘hfii—‘Hr—lb—At—Iv—‘r—I Dept.: $23 V- Judge: Hon. Donald Alvarez UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS, a Complaint Filed: May 2019 6, OONONMAUJNHOQOOQONUl-RMNHO California nonprofit organization; and DOES F’Afc Flled: December 21 2020 5 TO Trlal Date: None Set 1 50, inclusive, Defendant. 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL 0F CLAss ACTION SETTLEMENT \r \w ORDER This matter having come for hearing on January 21, 2021, regarding Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement “Moti0n”) on the terms (the set forth in the Class Action Settlement Agreement attached t0 the Declaration 0f Jonathan Melmed in Support 0f Plaintiff‘s Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement as Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Jonathan Melmed in Support of Plaintiff‘s Motion for Preliminary Approval (the “Settlement”). Having considered the Settlement, all papers and proceedings held herein, and having reviewed the entire record in this action, the court hereby finds and orders: 1. The court grants preliminary approval of the Settlement and the “Class” (as that 10 term is defined in the Motion) based upon the terms set forth in the Settlement. All terms used 11 herein shall have the same meaning as defined in the Motion. The resolution set forth in the 12 Settlement appears to be fair, adequate, and reasonable to the Settlement Class. 13 2. The Settlement falls within the range 0f reasonableness and is presumptively valid, 14 subject only t0 any objections that may be raised at the final fairness hearing and final approval by 15 this court. 16 3. A final fairness hearing 0n the question 0f whether the proposed Settlement, the 17 attorneys’ fees and costs to Class Counsel, and the Class Representative’s enhancement award 18 should be finally approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate as to the members of the Class is 19 scheduled in Department $23 on the date and time set forth in the implementation schedule in 20 paragraph 10 below. 21 4. This court approves, as t0 form and content, the Class Notice and Share Form 22 (“Class Notice”) to be distributed to the Class pursuant to the Settlement in substantially the same 23 form as is attached to the Settlement as Exhibit A. The Court approves the procedure for Class 24 Members t0 participate in, to opt out of, and t0 object t0 the Settlement as set forth in the 25 Settlement. 26 5. The court directs the mailing of the Class Notice by first class mail to the Class 27 Members in accordance with the implementation schedule set forth below. The Court finds the 28 dates selected for the mailing and distribution 0f the Notice, as set forth in the implementation 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL 0F CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT