On June 25, 2019 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Scanlon, Garrett M,
Scanlon, Suzi M,
Smith, Michael A,
and
Carlos Silberio Lamboy Gautier An Individual,
Cr England Inc A Corporation,
for Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
Jeffrey M. Lenkov (State Bar No. 156478)
jml@manningllp.com A ‘ J t,"
7
r
R. Scott Harlan (State Bar No. 312497) wk"! i»
‘1'
M
rsh@manningllp. com
"«
Edwin N. Sasaki (State Bar No. 158930) W
-
..
i
ens@manningllp.com 5W q
f.q\s‘.‘~.,j'3:uimam
'
‘~
pm
MANNING & KASS 5‘--'?=v*‘vw’\“~‘3V-‘~.
r? ‘
g '
>
ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP
801 S. Figueroa St, 15th Floor
Los Angeles, California 9001 7-3012
Telephone: (2 1 3) 624-6900
Facsimile: (213) 624-6999
ENGLAND, INC.
Attorneys for Defendants, C.R.
and CARLOS SILBERIO LAMBOY GAUTIER
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Luv
11
12 SUZI M. SCANLON, an individual; Case No. CIVDSl918714
TRESTER
GARRETT M. SCANLON, an individual; and [Hon Gilbert Ochoa, Dept. $24]
&KAS$
13 MICHAEL A. SMITH,
Law DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO
RAMIREZ,
,u
14 Plaintiffs, MOTION TO COMPEL
PLAINTIFFS'
MANNING
m’smmw
FURTHER RESPONSES RE:
15 v. SURVEILLANCE EVIDENCE
ELLROD,
16 C.R. ENGLAND, INC., a corporation; DECLARATION OF R. SCOTT HARLAN
CARLOS SILBERIO LAMBOY GAUTIER,
17 an individual; DOES through 100, inclusive,
1 [filed concurrently with Separate Statement]
18 Defendants. Hearing:
Date: January 28, 2021
19 Time: 9:00 a.m.
Dept: $24
20
Action Filed: June 25. 2019
21
22 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
23 Defendant C.R. ENGLAND, INC. submits its Opposition to Plaintiff‘s Motion to Compel
24 Further Responses to Surveillance Evidence, relating to Form Interrogatory No. 13.1 and Requests
25 for Production Nos. 63-75.
26 Form Interrogatory 13.1 asks if Defendant has conducted surveillance on any party t0 this
27 action and if so, t0 identify the person surveilled, give the date/time/place 0f surveillance, and
28 identity the person who conducted the surveillance.
4827-4941-3334]
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES
Requests for Production 63-75 all seeks documents or items relating 0r referring t0
surveillance 0f any party. RFP's 63-75 are set forth in full in the Separate Statement, but they are
summarized here for the Court's convenience.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 63:
A11 documents referring t0 surveillance conducted by Defendants.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 64:
All documents referring to surveillance by conducted Defendant's agents.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 65:
All surveillance photographs taken by Defendant.
10 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 66:
11 All surveillance photographs taken by Defendant's agents.
m
12 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 67:
TRESTER
13 All surveillance videos taken by Defendant.
lax
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION N0.
,u
MANNING§1KASS
RAMIREZ,
w
wen
I4 68:
2
(1
A
15 All surveillance videos taken by Defendant's agents.
ELLROD,
l6 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 69:
17 All surveillance audio recordings made by Defendant.
18 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 70:
19 All surveillance audio recordings made by Defendant's agent.
20 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 71:
21 All documents identifying who conducted surveillance for Defendant.
22 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 72:
23 All documents identifying the date when surveillance was conducted for Defendant.
24 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 73:
25 All documents identifying the location of any surveillance conducted for Defendant.
26 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 74:
27 All documents identifying the person who has the original 0r copy 0f any surveillance
28 photograph, film, 0r videotape.
4827-4941-3334.l
2
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES
Document Filed Date
January 14, 2021
Case Filing Date
June 25, 2019
Category
Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Jeffrey M. Lenkov (State Bar No. 156478) jml@manningllp.com A ‘ J t," 7 r R. Scott Harlan (State Bar No. 312497) wk"! i» ‘1' M rsh@manningllp. com "« Edwin N. Sasaki (State Bar No. 158930) W - .. i ens@manningllp.com 5W q f.q\s‘.‘~.,j'3:uimam ' ‘~ pm MANNING & KASS 5‘--'?=v*‘vw’\“~‘3V-‘~. r? ‘ g ' > ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP 801 S. Figueroa St, 15th Floor Los Angeles, California 9001 7-3012 Telephone: (2 1 3) 624-6900 Facsimile: (213) 624-6999 ENGLAND, INC. Attorneys for Defendants, C.R. and CARLOS SILBERIO LAMBOY GAUTIER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Luv 11 12 SUZI M. SCANLON, an individual; Case No. CIVDSl918714 TRESTER GARRETT M. SCANLON, an individual; and [Hon Gilbert Ochoa, Dept. $24] &KAS$ 13 MICHAEL A. SMITH, Law DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO RAMIREZ, ,u 14 Plaintiffs, MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFFS' MANNING m’smmw FURTHER RESPONSES RE: 15 v. SURVEILLANCE EVIDENCE ELLROD, 16 C.R. ENGLAND, INC., a corporation; DECLARATION OF R. SCOTT HARLAN CARLOS SILBERIO LAMBOY GAUTIER, 17 an individual; DOES through 100, inclusive, 1 [filed concurrently with Separate Statement] 18 Defendants. Hearing: Date: January 28, 2021 19 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept: $24 20 Action Filed: June 25. 2019 21 22 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 23 Defendant C.R. ENGLAND, INC. submits its Opposition to Plaintiff‘s Motion to Compel 24 Further Responses to Surveillance Evidence, relating to Form Interrogatory No. 13.1 and Requests 25 for Production Nos. 63-75. 26 Form Interrogatory 13.1 asks if Defendant has conducted surveillance on any party t0 this 27 action and if so, t0 identify the person surveilled, give the date/time/place 0f surveillance, and 28 identity the person who conducted the surveillance. 4827-4941-3334] OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES Requests for Production 63-75 all seeks documents or items relating 0r referring t0 surveillance 0f any party. RFP's 63-75 are set forth in full in the Separate Statement, but they are summarized here for the Court's convenience. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 63: A11 documents referring t0 surveillance conducted by Defendants. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 64: All documents referring to surveillance by conducted Defendant's agents. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 65: All surveillance photographs taken by Defendant. 10 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 66: 11 All surveillance photographs taken by Defendant's agents. m 12 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 67: TRESTER 13 All surveillance videos taken by Defendant. lax REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION N0. ,u MANNING§1KASS RAMIREZ, w wen I4 68: 2 (1 A 15 All surveillance videos taken by Defendant's agents. ELLROD, l6 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 69: 17 All surveillance audio recordings made by Defendant. 18 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 70: 19 All surveillance audio recordings made by Defendant's agent. 20 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 71: 21 All documents identifying who conducted surveillance for Defendant. 22 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 72: 23 All documents identifying the date when surveillance was conducted for Defendant. 24 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 73: 25 All documents identifying the location of any surveillance conducted for Defendant. 26 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 74: 27 All documents identifying the person who has the original 0r copy 0f any surveillance 28 photograph, film, 0r videotape. 4827-4941-3334.l 2 OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES